Leftist enemies of America know how to tap into the natural eagerness of their constituents to hurt Republicans/America.
So, they spew these conspiracy theories to get their fellows all worked up. You'll notice that the conspiracy claims are full of scientific inaccuracies as well as unrealistic expectations of how physical objects behave.
Here we have perfect empirical evidence of how that particular building design fails when struck by a jumbo jet. Two examples, two identical results. Yet the ignoranti insist it should not happen.
Building 7 suffered massive damage. 25% of its first 25 floors were gouged out then it burned for another 7 hours before finally collapsing. Conspiracy sites only show photos of the BACK side of the building that was away from the impact area. And the stupid people fall for it.
The WTC towers were designed to fall inside their own footprints. They were constructed in an urban area so their eventual take-down was planned for. Thank God they collapsed exactly as they were designed to. But the stupid people seem to think the designers would have built structures that might topple sideways in a crowded city? Yup.
The steel of the buildings' frames need not melt. It only needed to warm up beyond the engineered tolerance. As steel warms up, it gets softer. Warm it by a couple hundred degrees and it loses a tremendous amount of rigidity. But the stupid people think it actually has to MELT to fail.
*sigh* - don't they learn anything about the real world with those Liberal Arts degrees?
[Vapire Kitti - the CIA did NOT train Osama bin Laden. He was out to kill CIA agents too because they were infidels. The CIA worked with the Afghan Mujahedeen and avoided Osama like the plague.]
2006-09-06 20:23:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by speakeasy 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Examine the facts and come out of your "america land of the free home of the brave" fantasy. It was an inside job, they dont teach you how to fly a jumbo jet at airflight school. Large private planes maybe ( i happen to know pilots on a personal basis ) but not jumbo jets. These planes are the most sophisticated piece of machinery short of the space shuttle. TWO- the FBI had a tail on these people long before 9/11. Or how do you explain them arresting over 2000 people within 24 hours. How do you explain the top secret report given to bush a month before this happened that stated "Bin Laden determined to attack inside the US using airplanes..." explain that? The purpose of this was to enforce the patriot act. Study your history, the purpose of any government is to be able to have control over its citizens. Thats why weren't able to catch anyone BEFORE the attack but the Brits were. I hate to tarnish your perception of the bush administration but if you dont wake up and "smell the coffee" it will be too late for you and a whole lot of people. Why do you think the news spends so much time on crap like John Mark Karr when there are so many things going on in the world? They dont want you to know anything only to control what information you have access to. C'mon girl naiivete is cute on a 12 year old but it stops working after that.
2006-09-07 03:38:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by metalsoft@sbcglobal.net 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
you have to admit M. Shadows that there are a lot of unanswered questions. I'm no conspiracy nut, but some of the issues unanswered are
building 7 collapse (not even addressed in 9/11 report)
Pentagon crash (where is the security camera footage...the most secure building in the world can only produce 5 frames of a plane hitting it)
Flight 93 in Pennsylvania (where was the plane? recently a Ukraine flight crashed into the ground, clear evidence of plane engines, plane wings, plane parts, bodies, luggage, etc) No evidence of the bodies, blood, engines, or luggage...
NORAD drills of planes hitting the WTC the exact time and date of 9/11/01.
these are just a few. do your own research....who cares if you saw two planes hit the WTC. Don't limit this to doing your own research in addition to what you saw. Don't be so narrow minded.
2006-09-07 03:33:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I believe you shadows. Sometimes something this tragic is hard to wrap your mind around. I think some people choose to believe conspiracy theories because it is less scary than the truth. We were attacked by terrorists on American soil.
2006-09-07 03:41:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by frogspeaceflower 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
ur one of those "anti-conspiracy nut" nuts arnt you? its convenient how the buildings fell straight down .... also convenient that building7 fell without being hit ... ur viewpoint is the one the tv told you to have .... try researching it urself for some actual facts.
2006-09-07 03:25:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
You know what I said the day it happened, they paid people to do it. If the CIA trained osama what are the chances that they really don't know where he is? Very small. He was working with them and he got what he was looking for, to spread his ideas. I still think this is true.
2006-09-07 03:27:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by vampire_kitti 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Gosh, I find it nice to know people are so gullible. Thats why they like the democrats that lie so boldly, because they are idiots.
I think if you believe that crap your right to vote should be taken away for the rest of your life.
2006-09-07 03:28:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by MrPurrfect 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
True dat.
2006-09-07 03:24:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Tulsen 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
Love that avatar! but you stole my glasses though. lol jk =)
2006-09-07 03:26:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by dewdropinn 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Check this link.. maybe this will change your thinking !!!
http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/flash.htm#Main
2006-09-07 03:34:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by El Diablo 2
·
1⤊
1⤋