English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-06 19:04:40 · 8 answers · asked by tom l 3 in Games & Recreation Other - Games & Recreation

what's the point of the game then?

2006-09-06 19:10:29 · update #1

8 answers

The solution to tic-tac-toe, which it the implementation of perfect strategy, is a draw. Neither the X's nor O's can force a win. Given the limited number of possible plays, taking symmetry into account, most people will learn optimum strategy fairly quickly.

It is a decent teaching tool for children as it is likely the first non-random strategy game that they play. It gives children the opportunity to learn from errors in play, which is something that should translate into other learning by trial and error.

If the software is sophisticated enough, it might eventually allow computer algorithms to "learn" how to formulate strategy, sort of a primitive artificial intelligence at work. Perhaps it might be useful in preventing nuclear holocaust. :-)

2006-09-07 12:19:33 · answer #1 · answered by Ѕємι~Мαđ ŠçїєŋŧιѕТ 6 · 0 0

Young children lack the analytical ability to determine the optimal way to play tic-tac-toe, so the first few dozen or hundred times they play it is actually a playable game. If you're playing it past the age of say, 8, however, you're probably mentally retarded.

Many games are similar to this in that once you grasp how the game is best played, further play is rather futile, examples being Battleship, Connect Four, or Checkers, or any game with relatively simple rules and small number of moves and all the information is readily available (perfect information games).

2006-09-06 19:22:23 · answer #2 · answered by Sinai 3 · 0 0

YES.
The X needs to start in the center or corner. He needs to string three in a row, column, or diagonal.

The O then has two chances to block the string, whichever way the X goes.

So you are correct. Absent a stupid blunder from inexperience, Tic-Tac-To is just a child's game, and not worth much.

Othello is a better game.

Even better than Othello, is "Go".

2006-09-06 19:20:05 · answer #3 · answered by DinDjinn 7 · 0 0

yeah i know, that's why i've stopped playing since i was 8 yrs old or so
the point of the game is that u know u have to start first in order to win and u hope that ur opponent does not know the trick for winning OR ur really bored...(i opt for the latter)

2006-09-06 19:07:59 · answer #4 · answered by antigone 4 · 0 0

actually there is a trick to playing that gives you two options on you next move that guarantees a win no matter where your oponent places their mark.

2006-09-06 19:10:42 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

yes. i agree.. but there is an advantage if you're the one starting the game...

2006-09-06 19:12:48 · answer #6 · answered by _ehem_ 2 · 0 0

yes

2006-09-06 19:09:34 · answer #7 · answered by FLeX_BoZaCK 4 · 0 0

oh yes.. always

2006-09-06 19:11:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers