English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Pesident George W. Bush or Pesident Bill Clinton....

I think that Pesident George W. Bush is a bad pesident and I think that pesident Bill Clinton was a way better pesident then George W. Bush will ever be.

2006-09-06 15:39:30 · 13 answers · asked by Pants01 1 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

13 answers

Bill Clinton all the way. All though Clinton had has problems most of his 2 terms he sat as lame duck president with that said he still managed to wipe out government debt and boost out economy. What has Bush done since he took office put us back deep in debt with a war for oil that we are paying for at the pump and took our rights away to do anything about it with the patriot-act because of this act we now no longer are able to force against policies for fear of being accused of being a terrorists

2006-09-06 15:58:22 · answer #1 · answered by arlenebaby2001 2 · 1 1

Bill Clinton lied under oath and was impeached as president. It was only politics in the Senate that allowed him to remain president. Everybody acknowledged that he broke the law, they just didn't think that law was serious enough to kick out the president. As president, Clinton did all he could to weaken our military, impede our covert operations and make our enemies bold so that they could perpetuate 9-11.

Poor Bush may be a lot of negative things, but he's a man of integrity who is doing his best to protect our country. I don't know if you've noticed or not, but since 9-11, we have not had another attack in the US. Bush is taking the fight to our enemies. This fight however, is causing many Americans to hate Bush, because the fight is not an easy one. Many Americans would rather hide their head in the sand and hope the terrorist don't attack us again. These same Americans would hate on Bush even more if we were attacked again. They'd say he wasn't doing his job. Bush cannot win because whatever happens Americans will be against him. This makes our Islamic enemies very happy.

Its easy to say that Bush is a bad president and Clinton was a good president. You're talking with feelings and emotions. But when you look at the facts, and how Bush continues to protect America with his policies, there is not doubt as to who is the better president. Don't let your hate blind you to the facts.

TX Guy

2006-09-06 23:01:59 · answer #2 · answered by txguy8800 6 · 1 2

Republican presidents are typically drawn from dynasties. They truly represent very small, closed sects with their own agenda, which since as far back as "Honest. Abe" seems to be driving us into endless debt, denying our civil rights, polluting the environment for profit and the enrichment of their own families at everyone else's expense.
Democratic presidents usually come from the other 95% of us. Their agenda usually involves fixing the economy and undoing most of the damage caused by republican presidents.

Of course, they can't fix it all, so someday we will lose this great land of ours and perhaps the earth as well.

2006-09-06 22:59:18 · answer #3 · answered by elge13 3 · 2 1

Clinton!

2006-09-06 22:45:08 · answer #4 · answered by Guywiththehir 3 · 2 2

Clinton sold military secrets to china..,oh yeh hes way better than Bush..,you just dont like Bush because he doesnt let interns give him BJ's in the whitehouse.Cigar Monica????

2006-09-06 22:47:08 · answer #5 · answered by halfbright 5 · 2 1

Clinton had problems with morals and his personal life(infidelity). Bush, however, has major problems with policy, abundant scandal and morals(deceit). I believe Clinton was far from perfect but definitely better then Bush.

2006-09-06 22:45:30 · answer #6 · answered by ridingdragon 2 · 2 2

Our economy was great when Clinton was president!! Bush destroyed our economy!!! Why would they put a monkey in the white house??? It doesn't make sense!!!..........Monkeys destroy things........

2006-09-06 23:32:04 · answer #7 · answered by ☠Naz☠ 6 · 1 0

Ok both of them are nothing to get excieted about.

clinton hurt the overall economy and was way to weak on defense and almost destroyed our military.

Bush has reallly gotten the economy going, investments are really going great, Bush has had to bad events happen that he had no control over that no president could have handled,
But Bushes lax work on the immigration invasion is scary.

2006-09-06 22:44:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

bill clinton is only half the man President Bush is......and bill clinton is the reason we are in the state we're in, period.

2006-09-06 22:49:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Clinton is intellectually quite superior, and morally......i choose Clinton.....at least he only hurt his wife in all his messes.....poor ole dumb GW has blown up the world..........keep that swagger going my Texas buddy......he has just about worn that one out!!!!!!!!! We Texans are even tired of him. Don't anyone brag too much about his education.......in Ivy Leage schools, it is a matter of who you know, not what you know..ask me and will tell you

2006-09-06 22:57:11 · answer #10 · answered by Cassie 5 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers