Did "Liberals" manufacture all this "evidence" to bush whack President Bush ?

Question

Could this be the biggest conspiracy, in American history: An organized plan of action to oust our current administration ?

The official government story is that 911 was orchestrated by Al Queda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: see picture.
http://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6oAeK1dlHs&feature=PlayList&p=5C9C5F5FB50EF496&index=9

There are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the WTC buildings.
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEuDeU4IZjE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtBGKSZNWB4&feature=PlayList&p=5C9C5F5FB50EF496&index=7

Here is a video clip showing a trail of explosions just before the destruction wave.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_DkzhonpGY&mode=related&search=

Molten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite

A chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron yeilded an explosive, called Thermate. Also, see picture of WTC beam possibly cut using a demolition cutting charge (Thermate) or perhaps cut by an Iron Workers torch during rescue operations. Click on pic. to enlarge.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml

These factors point to a controled demolition of the buildings and thus an inside job. We also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329

There is also a problem with the Pentagon attack. Listen to this retired general, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=

We will not be able to know if 911 was a government cover up, for sure, until we can get our government to conduct an independent investigation, of this tragedy. That may not happen, for the duration of this administration, since it would probably not be, in their best interest. To compound the problem, they can not afford to lose control of the government. Many people are afraid to speak up against this administration, for fear of reprisal. If the situation were to start to get out of hand, the administration could declare marshal law (a police state), on its citizens. There are still many that have not seen beyond the official story: For several years, most of the evidence was swept up.

The majority of hard evidence, that has emerged over the past few years, supports the claim that this tragedy was conducted by our own government. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq: Like another Pearl Harbor. Why would they want to do this? You best read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tommorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

I have been trying to inform people of the evidence that is available to us. Would you take a look at about 8 -10 minutes of this interview with Professor Steven Jones ? It's a 45 minute video and well worth looking at, to its end. At the very least, pass it on to those you care about.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2842384983834100001

Answer 1

Well, well, well...I think that we need to open up our eyes to what Bush did AFTER 9/11. The past is the past and all of those people still alive that plotted against innocent people should be held to account for their actions; however, do you really think that this is political for the sake of one man? This is about money.

The people who REALLY DID DIE that day are heroes. Whomever did them in, which in fact was a group of Saudi Terrorists, was motivated by extremism. One extreme breeds the other because the universe likes balance.

On the other hand, buildings being demolished and people being lied to seems plausible, especially if the MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX and NEO-CONS and the CORPORATE AMERICAN MEDIA all joined hands and got a soda-pop at the park; but I digress, that soda-pop is made entirely of oil.

Answer 2

Probably a waste of my time, but here goes:

The officer who said the plane doesnt fit the hole is completely out in left field. The "hole" was not drilled or carefully bored into the side of the building - a damn plane bashed into it at 500+ MPH! The "hole" it would leave would be dependant entirely on the structual condition of the plane after impact and the amount of building material and debri that would natually fall into it. Who made this jerk an explosives expert, anyway? Conclution: Bogus information.

As for "secondary explosions" - they all seem to be in or near the vacinity of the impact area where the plane hit - pretty damn good planning and explosive placement considering a "controlled demolition" would have them in numerous areas of the building - from the ground floor up. I can't even imagine the sounds coming from that chaotic scene prior to the collapse - steel beams bending, crushing and breaking away and blasting through walls and concrete - I would be much more surprised if there were no "secondary explosions" reported.
Conclution: Pretty much what one would expect from a fully fueled jumbo jet crashing into a sky scraper at over 500 MPH.

The puddles of moulten metal? The fire burned in the towers at temperatures approaching 2000 degrees F - no surprise there. The loaded jetliner weighs in excess of 775,000 lbs on take off - that's over 388 TONS ! - and the aluminum and magnesium materials in the plane melt at approimately 725 degrees F. DO THE MATH - it sure would be a he!! of a lot more mysterious if there hadn't been any molten metal at ground zero.
Conclusion: Consistant with report.

And alledged reports of molten steel up to six weeks after the collapse - outside in NY in October (!) This is the heating system I want in my home !

I can go on, but I'm sure you get the drift. The web sites and blogs are feeding a conspiracy hunger fueled by people who just can't or won't let the truth impinge opon their opinion.

Answer 3

Some evidence in this disaster cannot be faked. What can't be faked is the utter stupidy of both Bush and Cheney.
Bush said, "Wow. That must be a bad pilot error". If Bush hadn't totally ignored those PDB's about Al Queda's threats, he would have immediately made the connection with terrorism instead of coming to his own ridiculous conclusion. Then he just sat there trying to project a calm response to the nation. If he had known in advance he would have projected an air of confidence, he would have delivered a little speech to the kids and then strode confidently out of the classroom. Instead, look at the image he left to the world, that of a bumbling idiot. Now he's got to do some serious damage control. "I was trying to project calm to the world". Hah!!! What a joke.

Now Cheney was too busy focusing on his own plans to seize control of the Iraqi oil fields to pay any attention to all those warnings about Al Queda either.
When he first heard of the attack, he was perplexed. "How could a plane hit the World Trade Center"? he asked himself.
I'm sure if this attack had been planned by the white house we would have seen these two jump up, take control of the situation immediately and not appear as stupid idiots.

They both had to scramble to cover up their stupidity. Neither one could fake a wet dream.
Criminal profilers talk about organized and unorganized crime's. Their behavior was so sloppy that day I would categorize them as unorganized.
Their stupidity is the genuine article, the real deal. That's what allowed 9-11 to happen.

Answer 4

Yes, it was manufactured by liberals, your videos are full of more holes than the buildings that were hit. Ask yourself this, why would a President kill his own people for an excuse to invade Iraq when he could do it without? Also, do you know how big a hole a plane makes hitting a thick concrete building at over 500 miles an hour? Did you conveniently forget the plane had a flight number and that witnesses saw it hit? Who said said that the steel melted from fuel? The impact and fuel removed insulation and WEAKENED the steel! Is there anybody that knows the proper way a skyscraper is supposed to fall when hit by airplanes? I'll answer that for you, NO!

Answer 5

No, since there is no false evidence, there are many things that can sound or appear, but it is evident what really happened, all else is just silly stories that too many people with over active minds get fooled with.

And the sound of one floor falling into another would sound like a explosion and/ or while objects in the building blow up, tanks, containers and more.

This was just what it was, a terrorist act where terrorist flew planes into the towers, all else is just sad wile ideas of week minded people, most of who just hate bush so much they pray for some other reason.

Answer 6

Well then your thesis is wrong. It would be the Republican Conservatives that manufactured the incident to get ut into the war!

And who is to say the Terrorists didn't have explosives or thermite on the jet planes! We don't know what they did or didn't have.

A lot of fuel spilled, a lot of walls, ceilling tiles office furntature and other things that are flamable when up in flames for several stories.

Sounds like you listening to the Lone Gunmen or Alex Jones too much.

I'd listen to them and file it away just like a would a statement from Bush or Kennedy or the NY TImes, but I wouldn't base my life on it!

Answer 7

Steven Jones worships David Ray Griffith and Dylan Avery. Watch the movie "Screw Loose Change".

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1506026976066602012

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1704985757029288892

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8331615143873106815

Answer 8

Answering the initial question, yes,. of course they have. Those are the way out, "ultra" liberals. Youtube is one of the biggest. They are conservatives! There's also some guy who is doing the same despicable thing.

Answer 9

Oh, the old, "plane does not fit the hole" theory. And what happens when you throw a thin-skinned, relatively light aluminum object, which is mostly air, at a steel, concrete and kevlar reinforced building? I don't know if you knbow this or not, but a thin aluminum wing isn't going to do much damage, even at 400 mph.

Answer 10

whats the problem find the money the only persons family business that could bid the contracts for the oil pipelines in Iraq was osama and we as in g w and papa had already decided to attack Iraq its an easy win and an election year bonanza of votes