2006-09-06 14:12:37 · 3 answers · asked by mouthbreather77 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Its who you kill, not how many. And being able to escape after killing your target is what puts fear into the public and the people you want to scare or kill. Suicide missions are for religious fanatics, they tend to kill innocents and children. To kill a target and be able to get to safe place and then go back and kill again is the meaning of success, and is much more honorable. I was more afraid for people during the DC sniper thing(To call these moron lowlifes snipers is to give thenm too much credit) then 911. 911 was a one-time thing caused and planned by ?, but a sniper or snipers, real ones that can shoot 3 inch patterns at more than 300 yards would cause more panic at least in this country than fear of another government fuc*up like 911. Anarchy is about confusion and disorder, a massive death toll has no place in this word, that word would be chaos, and chaos unlike anarchy, has no purpose.
2006-09-06 14:33:24 · answer #1 · answered by Later Me 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither one is anarchy by any stretch. The futility or success of either tactic is always a gamble. Sometimes it pays off, sometimes it doesn't. That's war.
2006-09-06 21:21:11 · answer #2 · answered by Paladin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
suicide bombings
If anyone has been to Israel lately...you'll understand why.
2006-09-06 22:14:49 · answer #3 · answered by omarr215 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋