2006-09-06 13:41:24 · 9 answers · asked by I am watching your every move. 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
No.
If instrument means "tool" then a voice is not a tool, in the traditional normal sense.
2006-09-06 13:46:30 · answer #1 · answered by MK6 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes. The first definition of "instrument" in Webster's is:
1 : a device used to produce music; also : a singing voice
2006-09-06 20:47:47 · answer #2 · answered by orang31na 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not often because if u listen 2 a instrumental u get like every once in a while noise not much dont know if that was help
2006-09-06 20:45:21 · answer #3 · answered by chrisandgrandtheftauto 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
voice -the sound or sounds uttered through the mouth of living creatures
instrument - a mechanical tool or implement, esp. one used for delicate or precision work
so voice is not an instrument
2006-09-06 21:01:21 · answer #4 · answered by prad 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Stratobratster on guitar, Paul McCartney on bass, Ringo Starr on drums, Norah Jones on piano, fearophobia on vocals? What a band! The two surviving Beatles, Norah Jones, me, and you! Yes "vocals" is considered an instrument.
2006-09-06 20:47:16 · answer #5 · answered by Stratobratster 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course it is.. any item, whether organic or non-organic can be classified as an instrument..
2006-09-06 20:48:32 · answer #6 · answered by chuckufarley2a 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depending on the pitch and delivery, it can certainly be an instrument of torture...
2006-09-06 20:43:58 · answer #7 · answered by CC...x 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not nessarily, the voice is more of a skill to be mastered.
2006-09-06 20:45:52 · answer #8 · answered by danman17a 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2006-09-06 20:46:32 · answer #9 · answered by ALFRED G 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋