English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

does he smell bad?..or is it just that he has nothing but a long list of failures and being seen with him is a career ender?

2006-09-06 11:58:19 · 33 answers · asked by bush-deathgrip 1 in Politics & Government Politics

33 answers

He's kept us from being attacked for 5 years, he lowered taxes, the economy is booming. Liberals and demonrats hate that. Many americans are so stupid they can't see past the liberal media lies.

2006-09-06 12:01:36 · answer #1 · answered by kimmyisahotbabe 5 · 3 6

Try this:

1. There are media hogs that know they will get a fluff piece written about them. See Senator McCain on this one
2. They genuinely disagree with the Pres. I support the Republican immigration bill in the House. This is a part from the President. Go Tom Tancredo and crew.
3. They want to score political points. There a many Republicans out there who feel they need to distance themselves to win reelection. See blue state Republicans. I live in CT and we have 3 of our 5 Congressman that are Republicans. This will backfire on them because the Republican base cannot stand spineless Republicans and they will not vote for them or vote them out.
4. PRESIDENT BUSH'S CAREER IS OVER. HE CANNOT RUN FOR REELECTION.

2006-09-06 12:07:47 · answer #2 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 1 1

I propose that the better minimize for contributions be executed away with, and that the utmost payouts in retirement nevertheless proceed to be as they're, adjusted for inflation. Social safe practices isn't a "supply away" application yet one which all of us make contributions to love a mark downs plan, and must be shielded from different makes use of with the help of the authorities. Do you compromise or disagree and why? when you're so anxious about it then why no longer; first placed it back into the own sector and make to were no can take out money from it for his or her very own interest, 2d pay back each penny you've borrowed from both Social safe practices and Medicare, third take the unlawful immigrants off of it and those who come over the following yet in no way paid a penny to it, and finally have it an analogous for each body; in different words authorities officials are to participate in it and in the adventure that they prefer something more desirable they do it on their very own with out the tax payers funding it?yet, the monetary stytem feeding the imbalances had in no way been truly replaced. They, a set of scholars, stated that each human being prices of interest might want to be 3% or a lot less for each body to develop into rich if wanted (that would want to be authentic also to taces). the proper monetary concern might want to be, they suggested, even as there have been no prices of interest. Why no longer do this answer? the rich might want to nevertheless be rich. My question is: even as soial safe practices will develop right into a topic linked to federal expenses, why no longer artwork with a balanced or benefit funds and spend no more desirable than is offered in, as any kin has to attempt for? Why no longer ban all loobying presents with the intention to get rules that serve the country? God bless u . s . a ..

2016-11-25 01:15:27 · answer #3 · answered by mansell 4 · 0 0

I'm not for or against Bush... this has been a culmination of Presidents and their collected failures and decision making.. you can't blame it all on one person.

2006-09-06 12:50:31 · answer #4 · answered by Sugar 3 · 0 0

Seen with bush means that people may thing that the person agrees with all his desicions, kinda like what has ahappened to tony blair in england

2006-09-06 12:02:03 · answer #5 · answered by pj2024 3 · 1 1

On one of the few interviews I ever bothered to watch with Bush (I don't waste my time with liars) he said he didn't care how future generations remembered him because, as he said, we will all be dead by then, anyway, so why care. What a wonderful attitude to govern with, like who cares if the air is breathable in 50 years, who cares if anybody can afford a house, or health care, or even have a job. Who cares if the US is in debt up to its eyeballs to Communist China?? So if Republicans are walking away from him now, they are walking away from the result of their having backed him in his two elections--all of this could have been avoided if people had just looked at his record, available for all to see in "Shrub" by Molly Ivins, and known he would be the disaster that he has been. Frankly, a country stupid enough to elect a guy like him has given up its future. And so it goes...

2006-09-06 12:03:41 · answer #6 · answered by jxt299 7 · 2 3

the conservative (old-school penny-pinching) Republicans are distancing themselves from the neo-conservative (budget-breaking spendthrifts worse than democrats) Republicans. Bush has begun to, unfortunately, look like the latter group.

2006-09-06 12:01:27 · answer #7 · answered by dimbulb52 3 · 4 1

There are recent articles on this in most of the papers. You might want to read the text beneath the headlines you've obviously seen.

2006-09-06 12:00:56 · answer #8 · answered by ? 5 · 3 1

Not many. Some politicians of both parties bend in the wind.
But not like with Carter and Clinton. The Democrats ran for the hills. They pulled up their socks and grabbed their cocks.

2006-09-06 12:06:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Because he holds hands with Saudi Princes.

2006-09-06 12:04:01 · answer #10 · answered by worldneverchanges 7 · 2 0

The big question is why they would choose him as a frontman in the first place. Yeah, I know whose son he is, and who really controls things, but he really is an embarrassment.

2006-09-06 12:06:40 · answer #11 · answered by catarina 4 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers