English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

The GDP is a useless indicator.

Check out the following article to see why:

http://www.mises.org/story/770

2006-09-06 16:30:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Nope, nada !! Only in the broadest possible sense, say over a 10-20 year period could you draw a meaningful correaltion. These numbers are "feel-good" statistics that have more to do with polls than economic well being.

2006-09-06 20:55:58 · answer #2 · answered by denaliguide2 3 · 0 0

Real GDP per capita has some pretty profound impacts. Its not the only thing that matters, but all other things being equal, I'll take as much growth in real GDP per capita as possible, thanks.

2006-09-08 09:13:05 · answer #3 · answered by kheserthorpe 7 · 0 0

No... cause its all about the finer points of Micro and Macro Economics in the end.... comprende? ha ha

2006-09-06 18:10:53 · answer #4 · answered by Drew 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers