They practically look like men, look at condaleeza rice and Hilary Clinton...what happened to all those beauty queens who wanna be in politics?
2006-09-06 10:04:03 · 20 answers · asked by frat_brotha 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I think you see the difference between a woman who is shouldering some of the weight of the world, and one who takes a mandatory, desultory interest in politics to further a career based on her looks and body.
In other words, the difference between a person who chooses to take on an important role in society, and one who chooses to be fluff. One who spends her time in a job of substantial societal importance, and one who spends long hours in front of a mirror, in a gym, in a hair/makeup artists chair, or under a plastic surgeon's knife. One who spends her life in service to society (whether you agree with their politics or not), and one who spends her life in service to her own appearance.
I don't agree that either Hillary Clinton or Dr. Rice are ugly women. They have eventful lives, and those lives show in the character and care on their faces. But, obviously, they are very busy people; they don't spend their time trying to look like beauty queens. Which, I assume, a beauty queen must.
It's sad that people care so much about appearances, and I would encourage you to pay attention to the more important issues these women represent regardless of whether or not you find their faces unattractive. Focussing on trivial issues instead of paying heed to the activities of our politicians is what got us into this mess to begin with.
2006-09-06 10:51:37 · answer #1 · answered by functionary01 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd say your from the states mate, condi is quite nice and hilary looks like a nice miltf if you go on google get up margaret beckett british member of parliament, BLIMEY mate you'll run a mile that is SUPERUGLY>
2006-09-06 10:12:41 · answer #2 · answered by qcumber man 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess they just take the part of politician too serious and become more like their male counterparts. I guess its hard to keep up with your make up when you have a busy schedule.
2006-09-06 10:10:21 · answer #3 · answered by Mrs. Me 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The beauty queens make more money and have less controversy being models and actresses.
2006-09-06 10:06:51 · answer #4 · answered by butrcupps 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How dare you call Hillary Clinton ugly when she's the one who's gonna make sure that your black a%@ has affirmative action!
2006-09-06 10:10:58 · answer #5 · answered by Plus-Sized &Proud 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It takes a long time to become successful in politics. many decades. By then you are old and not attractive anymore.
2006-09-06 12:33:24 · answer #6 · answered by Duffman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ugliness is subjective. Imho, Hillary is beautiful and Bush is ugly.
2006-09-06 10:14:20 · answer #7 · answered by applejuice 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Politics wears them out.
2006-09-06 10:08:54 · answer #8 · answered by Egroeg_Rorepme 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well, you look at them for their opinions not their boob size don't ya? Ugly is not as distracting as beauty
*sigh* I could never be in politics
2006-09-06 10:09:56 · answer #9 · answered by *only~wishful~thinking* 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
to go with the ugly men polititicans look at cheney and rumsfeld.
2006-09-06 10:07:59 · answer #10 · answered by region50 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋