2006-09-06 09:20:01 · 24 answers · asked by isaac a 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Another attempt by Coragryph to answer a direct question.Oh by the way Coragryph is the guy that said to reason with terrorists.I guess the reality of doing that completely befuddled him.
2006-09-06 09:27:13 · update #1
"Open up a dialogue with terrorists" is a common sentiment proposed by Liberals and Democrats.We have all seen it here on Q@A. Now you want to deny it. Typical.
2006-09-06 10:05:30 · update #2
I asked a direct question and haven't got a direct answer yet.
2006-09-06 10:07:13 · update #3
You're under arrest ....
That is, by the way, what civilized people do, they have trials ... then they execute the bastard.
2006-09-06 09:24:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
That question can't be answered because no liberal or no democrat is saying we should try and negotiate with Osama. None. What we can do is what a former president did. That's provide weapons to a government that supports terrorism in exchange for that government intervening to get American hostages released. The name of that president escapes me at the moment but I think he used to be a movie actor.
2006-09-06 16:26:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
I am a realist and I know that the very instant bin Laden is killed or makes a bargin with a non muslim country or govt., there will be thousands of other bin Ladens take his place or make a more radical vow within 30 seconds. It is NOT a person who is a terrorist but an ideology.
2006-09-06 16:26:51 · answer #3 · answered by Tony T 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think the only Americans ( liberal or otherwise ) that actually had the chance to sit across a table from Osama, are the Bush family ( google for it , if you don't believe it ) and some military and CIA agents, when they used to train him, Fund him and support him, so that he could fight the Russians in Afghanistan.
Why don't you ask them ?
2006-09-06 16:47:39 · answer #4 · answered by Morbeous 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You're a closed-minded fool who can't think beyond the labels that the media is providing for you.
Feel free to look up a liberal in your own neighborhood, and spend some time listening to what they actually have to say. You'll probably be surprised at how much it sounds like what you're thinking.
2006-09-06 16:28:34 · answer #5 · answered by abfabmom1 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You're a moron. I've never heard a liberal say that we should reason with terrorists. That's just another one of the neo-con "facts" that just don't check.
Speaking as a liberal, I'd have his dumb a$$ arrested. Which is a lot more than what neo-con would do.
2006-09-06 16:27:12 · answer #6 · answered by darkemoregan 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Complex situations exist in the middle east and various strategies are needed. Every Muslim is not Osama, though your man, Bush tries to paint it so. It's very interesting that Osama is being mentioned daily by Bush, after years of silence.
2006-09-06 16:23:28 · answer #7 · answered by ? 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
As opposed to BAM Osama Bin Laden is dead and the whole war on terror is over? Wake up and smell the universe, bud.
2006-09-06 16:24:24 · answer #8 · answered by Hate Boy! 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do you neocons constantly distort the truth Liberals have never wanted to talk to bin laden. liberals were the ones saying we should have focused on catching him its you neocons that let him off the hook by diverting the militarys attention into iraq. If osama was across the table from you neocons he would say thanks for taking the heat off of me. Liberals would bring him to justice.
2006-09-06 16:31:05 · answer #9 · answered by region50 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Name a Democrat that said we shouldn't be going after Osama. We are pissed that we are diverting to troops to Iraq instead of hunting down Bin Laden.
2006-09-06 16:23:46 · answer #10 · answered by miggity182 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Who said anyone wants to reason with them? Quote me a politician who ever said we should reason with them. There is a middleground between bombing civilians and making tea for Osama. How about using law enforcement and intelligence?
2006-09-06 16:23:39 · answer #11 · answered by Eugena 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋