2006-09-06 08:55:14 · 18 answers · asked by CaSeY LyNe 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
I have socks older than that !
2006-09-06 08:58:27 · answer #1 · answered by jim 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. 28 is still really young. At the rate people are living today, 50 is pushing it to be called old.
2006-09-06 15:57:51 · answer #2 · answered by Jess 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no way. I think 28 is probably the best age to be...at least I'm looking forward to it. (I'm 22, I still feel that I need to experience more and go through more to become wiser and stronger.) At 28 you're still in your twenties but you're wiser, stronger, more dignified, more accomplished as far as career and finances, and more resilient than younger twenty-somethings. And still you're almost 30 which is like the new 20 anyway...
2006-09-06 16:00:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course not. I don't really believe in "old". I know that sounds retarded but I don't. If I was 4 and you were 28. Then yes.. It's old. But I'm not 4.
2006-09-06 15:58:10 · answer #4 · answered by stumble__replay 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO 28 is not old
those people that are criticizing baby suri have no soul and are burning in hell, they are jealous that no one gives a flying **** about their kids, they are jealous,how dare they say anything about a baby, when shiloh was born and pcitures were plastered all over the internet, some people were calling her a bastard and saying she was an ugly baby, regarless of their parents, they are babies, people need to leave them alone
2006-09-06 17:01:27 · answer #5 · answered by lovebritsean 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NOBODY thinks 28 is old. If you do, you are not old enough to be on this site. Go get your mother.
2006-09-06 15:57:47 · answer #6 · answered by MOM KNOWS EVERYTHING 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think I am old too, I'm 29. The thing I hate about it is that in my mind I'm still 20 but my a** keeps spreading and my boobs are starting for downhill. That's what sucks, body changes.
2006-09-07 09:53:58 · answer #7 · answered by Blah Blah Blah 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I did, when I was 14.
2006-09-06 15:58:01 · answer #8 · answered by L3-knightw1zard 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, since the average life expectancy is 72. You only have 44 years to live!
2006-09-06 15:58:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't.
Only someone under 28 might.
2006-09-06 16:07:29 · answer #10 · answered by Mahira 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not even!!! I will be 35 this month and things are only getting better. The older you get, the more you appreciate life.
2006-09-06 16:08:57 · answer #11 · answered by Phoenix Rising 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋