what evidence was there that proved it wasn't an inside job on 9/11?

Question

just that i read in paper today that a load of people reckon that america actually done it, so theyd have a massive reason to go blow the **** out of iraq, which by the way had nothing to do with 9/11 it was afghanistan.

right ok.... voltaire.. youre a cockend, im not in the mood to type properly what does it matter anyway??

and also.... whoever said summat about hatred or whatever, i was just curious, i don't genuinely believe it was an inside job ok, just interested to see what people think.
but voltaire, christ if i ever see you about i swear

Answer 1

Ya know, the more I hear about this... I am realizing that Cheney and Rumsfeld undersestimated the American ppl... we will find the truth. Most of us already feel it. We know they did this to us.

Answer 2

An extremely under educated nation called Afghanistan simply hosted radical islamic fanatics like bin laden and the talaban, now they're not. However the problem still exist and nobody in the free world understands. Sure, Afghanistan has a democracy now but the talaban and al queda still hanging around. Your'e right, Irag had little to do with it (wtc) but they were shooting at us in the no fly zone and had some terrorist stuff going on. Fact is: Both nations needed to be blown out of the sky due to the way they mutilated women on behalf of (they say) Islam and their feeling about other religions in their respective countries. As to your basic question: Do confessions count as prof?

Answer 3

There isn't a lot of evidence to prove it wasn't an inside job, only the fact that Bush has plausible deniability. The weight of the evidence against is so strong its unbelievable. If the Government wasn't involved in any way then you would think they would help themselves out by trying their best to solve the Al Qaida situation and keeping the reins on the FBI. The FBI for instance took all the videotapes from all CCTV cameras within any distance from the Pentagon so no one could see what exactly hit it. If it was a plane with terrorists in it as they say it is, why look as if youre covering it up?

Answer 4

None. It's all speculation presented as fact and conspiracy theorists are eating it up. It's a load of amatuer physicists claiming 'this could never happen' and taking statements out of context.
Please take a look at the online mini-doc 'Loose Change' and this counter-arguement:
http://www.loosechangeguide.com/LooseChangeGuide.html

If the far left is ever going to be heard they need to stop wasting their time (and damaging their credibility) with conspiracy theories. Honestly, how can one claim that Bush is an idiot and in the same breath claim that he's the mastermind behind what would be the largest conspiracy and attack in US history. It just doesn't add up.

Answer 5

Reality.
Anybody that watched it happen live knows it was not an inside job.
Use your brain. It is impossible to rig demolition explosives in a 110 story building that is actively inhabited by 25,000 people every day and not have a single person notice.

Only people blinded by irrational hatred could ignore all facts, all evidence, all science, and all sense to think it was an inside job.

Hate leads to the dark side - Yoda.
What is your hatred turning you into?

Answer 6

I read something similar in The Times. By the way 'Voltaire' sounds a bit of a gimp to me. I might try to find a book about it.

Answer 7

the towers were designed by a Japanese guy and he said himself that the towers were supposed to take multiple hits before crashing down. so idk

"supposedly" after the planes hit the towers, (the inside people not afghanistans) there were bombs placed on the 4 corners (on the skeleton part of the building which holds the tower together )of the upper tower on almost every floor ( except the bottom part) they bombed it cuz they knew the towers wouldnt fall ( it was back up in case ) after the bomb explosion on the few upper floors it was enough pressure from the top to crash inward toward the building. ( i saw the planes hit )

Answer 8

"...Actually done it?" Ouch! You need the word "had" before the word "actually" in order for your question to be taken seriously by well educated readers. Also, the more intellgent persons here will tend to ignore the question more frequently if the writer neglects conventions of written language, such as capitalizing the names of nations and capitalizing the first word of each sentence. (Seeking answers from the less intelligent and less educated is quite all right. You could communicate that wish in your elaboration section.)

Answer 9

1. You cannot prove a negative, so asking for proof that it WASN'T an inside job is useless.

2. Our administration under Bush informed the American people that Iraq was an Al-Qaeda ally and assisted them in their attacks on America. This has been proven to be untrue, but it DID help get them get support to invade Iraq.

Answer 10

The only evidence supporting the Government's Conspiracy theory regarding 19 hijackers has bee found to be fake.
So, to answer your question, there is no evidence proving it was NOT an inside job i.e. it WAS an inside job, for which there is much evidence.

A logical explanation is available at

Manufactured terrorism

http://members.iinet.net.au/~holmgren/manufactured.html

Answer 11

That's just stupid. The confusion arises because I suspect one of the planes was shot down by the US military, but they had no choice. I don't like Bush, but I find it hard to believe that any US administration would risk such a destructive incident. It could have wiped out rather more of NY than, tragically, it did.