English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

None of the terrorists was fromIraq.

2006-09-06 07:36:37 · 19 answers · asked by doggiebike 5 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

To Wally Iraq was not harboring terrorists.
Pakistan is also our "friend" yet the people don't like us.
Just because a government aligns itself with us does not mean they have the will of the people
After the first Gulf War the people of Kuwait wanted reforms. The government responded by threating to cut off government subsidies, funded by oil. The people relented.
Most Arab countries are family businesses run to make a profit.

2006-09-06 07:46:12 · update #1

19 answers

because the Bush family and the Bin Laden family are actually friends we just went to war to appease the American population, and so our government decided the best thing to do would be to pretend like we were going after Osama Bin Laden but really we would go after the oil in Iraq like we did when Bush's father was the president

2006-09-06 07:40:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

That's an easy question to answer...

We are not at War with Saudi Arabia because the Royal Family and the Bin Laden Family have very close ties, with the Bush Family.

If you remember, on September 11th, 2001, after all Air Traffic was grounded, there was only One plane allowed in the air (Besides our Military Jets) and that plane contained the Bin Laden Family and some members of the Saudi Royal Family.

2006-09-06 08:00:52 · answer #2 · answered by MSJP 4 · 0 0

Saudi Arabia has bought and paid for all the White House and Congressional influence it needs. This is why the recently released 9-11 report contains no mention of the secret documentation of Saudi Arabian complicity in the terrorism that took 3,000 American lives. As Senator Shelby noted on PBS NewsHour recently (he has read the secret report), 93% of the blanked out pages, and specifically those on Saudi sponsorship of terrorism against America and other nations, is a "con man's" effort to avoid "embarrassment." As the families of the 9-11 victims have said, "we need to know." The US ruling circles preferred to ignore the Saudi hatred as long as they could share in the Saudi spoils. Now the lower and middle class soldiers are paying in blood to maintain the links between the US's upper classes, the Saudi ruling family, and oil money.

During the Clinton Administration; The CIA was so neutered that it was incapable of penetrating the numerous organizations such as the Islamic Brotherhood and other predecessors, affiliates, and allies of al Qaeda.
We can't continue to have it all in the USA; cheap gas and oil, while sticking our heads in the sand when it comes to Saudi sponsored hate factories which turn out demented jihadists to commit acts of terrorism like 9/11, and thinking that somehow democracy is the answer to all of the problems just like we have funded in the name of fighting communism over the years. 9/11 is only the largest expression of the terrorists' hatred for us, but it is certainly not the last. If we continue our present policies of overlooking Saudi complicity in nurturing these organizations for the sake of the oil business then we should only expect further attacks on our soil and abroad.
Saudi Arabia is more and more an irrational state. a place that spawns global terrorism even as it succumbs to an ancient and deeply seated isolationism, a kingdom led by a royal family that can?t get out of the way of its own greed. Is this the fulcrum we want the global economy to balance on??

To all of you simpletons blaming Bush,this is not a republican nor a democratic issue, there has been a bi-partisan sale of our govt since the end of WW2 Every administration since FDR, who have turned the other cheek in order to maintain the flow of cheap oil into the USA.. money flows from the Saudis and the oil industry into political coffers on both sides of the aisle, for presidential, congressional and senate races, and former administration officials' jobs (remember Kissinger excused himself from the 9/11 commission rather than identify his clients) .Being partisan has nothing to do with it, buying favors has everything to do with it.

2006-09-06 08:24:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Your question is invalid.
It's not yet common knowledge, but when the truth is fully in the open it will be.
There were no hijackers, and no large jets involved in 9/11 It's all a complete hoax, and most people have been fooled by it.
No doubt most readers will find this statement alarming. The truth often is.
The sites listed below contain sufficient detail to get you on track.
The information has been debated by the entire 9/11 truth movement, and has only recently been made available to the general public.
You can be one of the first to get in on the truth.
Take a look at the sites below.
If you already well versed in 9/11 truth, then go to the second site, or if this is your introduction, read both. Won't take long

2006-09-06 20:33:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

The Bushes and Chaney own oil wells in Kuwait.
when the then president Bush went into the gulf war he was protecting his oil wells. He who has the oil rules the world.
To have the oil wells in Iraq would be a real security move.
They already are friends with the saudis, see no reason to over take them. Besides they are best friends.
They can put a missle in someones pocket, they know where Ben Laudin is. To capture him would end the reason for the war.
It is all about the oil.

2006-09-06 08:08:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The creeps from Saudi Arabia and Bib Laden himself trained and were financed by Saddam. The terrorists who volunteered to commit suicide for Bin Laden did not consider themselves as Saudis, they were Muslims who hated Israel and America. Of course they had their minds on those 72 beautiful young virgins too. The koran says that anyone committing suicide will end up in hell. It's way too hot down there for sex.
Put it this way - - if Panama was planning to attack countries in South America,and advertised for volunteers to fly planes, offering them great rewards when all of South America was taken. If a few Americans with some flying experience volunteered in order to get the goodies, even though those people were acting against American law, should Brazil declare war against the US because of the outlaw flyers ?
What's the difference which country outlaws are from, if they're not acting in the interest of their country ? It's the place that trains and pays them. That place was Iraq.

2006-09-06 08:06:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bin Laden might be from Saudi Arabia, but that's not the country that hid him. That would be Afghanistan, I think. But we are in Iraq as an indirect result of 9-11, not a direct result. Saddam appeared to be threatening to become a terrorist, so we got rid of him. I think we did a good thing for his people and for the rest of the world. We should have done it a decade ago. But we as a nation weren't strong enough psychologically to do it then. 9-11 made us strong enough to do it now.

2006-09-06 07:48:12 · answer #7 · answered by MornGloryHM 4 · 0 0

The Saudi royal family is very large... I've heard some talk about their being an anti-American separatist movement... but for the most part they love our money and I think part of invading Iraq may have been their idea... or at least that it was up to their approval. they have a lot of economic power in the U.S.

Fighting Saudi Arabia would have been difficult... they have so much money they could raise an army fast, they could buy the weapons from our own corporations, and would have done so before the attack if it was their intention to start a war.

2006-09-06 07:45:28 · answer #8 · answered by Aleksandr 4 · 0 2

And the suicide "lover boys" who are wanting to meet 100 virgins in Alla Land are Homosexuals. But the price that one pays for practicing Homosxualist Activity in Saudi Arabia is "Death By Decapitation" . . . But no one ever discusses this fact. Muhammad Atta lived with a woman for nearly two years and she had her children with her. Yet, the two of them never slept together as husband & wife either. Here in the USA, when you "de-closet yourself" you become inundated with several meaningless "Special Laws" that makes you a better person than your counter-part who does not have that kind of brain damage. However, in Saudi Arabia, if you mention that you have one iota of mental illness related to Homosexualism then they will just simply cut your head off. Wouldn't you rather once-and-for-all be cured of your illness and then be awarded clean girls who have never been touched by another man, than to have to lose your head for nothing? And as long as you are on planet earth then you can't like little girls ... You have to like little boys because of your mental health. However, if you just wink at a boy then off goes your gourd! This IS NOT an opinion. This is the truth. Why do you think that those teenage boys all want to commit suicide? It's because Testosterone is running wild in their bloodstream at that age. I know. I had that same thing when I was a teenager. However, I liked girls NOT boys!

2006-09-06 08:46:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The Saudi Arabian government has their own hands full fighting terrorist in their own country. Yes, there are terrorist in Saudi Arabia but it makes no sense for us to go to war there when the government is already fighting them.

If you can remember back to 9/11 Pres Bush said our war was against terrorist and the countries that protect them.

2006-09-06 07:40:36 · answer #10 · answered by Dr. D 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers