I have a THEORY as to WHY Bush & Company executed the 911 attacks. What do you think about it?

Question

John Kerry said: "Because President Bush lost focus on the killers who attacked us and instead launched a disastrous war in Iraq, today Osama bin Laden and his henchmen still find sanctuary in the no man's land between Afghanistan and Pakistan, where they still plot attacks against America."

This is key: "where they still plot attacks against America."

If that doesn't PROVE that there is NO DIFFERENCE between Democrats and Republicans, these days, then nothing will EVER convince you. Face it, 911 was an inside job. And worse, it is NOT about oil....read more...

The USA is a REPUBLIC. FYI.

This entire thing has become clear to me. 911 was about the COMPLETE obliteration of the Republic philosophy. The Republican Party is just a loosely tied "thing" that sounds bad now, after what Bush has done to the USA. It works to their favor if you think about it.

911, Afghanistan, Iraq, Israel, Lebanon, and now Iran. All about completely destroying the Republic, for which it stands.
more...

Think about it. A Republic guarantees people freedom and power over government and what government does. A Democracy grants government complete control disguised as the will of the people.

Yep, 911 was an inside job, but the target was never oil. It is the complete annihilation of "The Republic, for which it stands."

It is sad, how few can really think. I would say it was amazing, but after watching Bush and noting that he was not carted off in a straight-jacket, well, I can only summizethat most people are idiots.

I claimed a THEORY, stated it and asked what you all thought. To those who don't get it, reread the freaking question. Sheesh....

Answer 1

yes -- in order to destroy the republic there has to be war in order to justify the draconian government that is in power now. If there was no war created then the hard handed government that exists now would not be tolerated

Answer 2

Well like a broken clock you are only right twice a day

The USA is a Republic - TRUE

911, Afghanistan, Iraq, Israel, Lebanon, and now Iran. All about completely destroying the Republic, for which it stands. TRUE

But not for the reason you may think- How about that the mullahs want us destroyed. Iran wants us destroyed.

You think our gov is evil yet when evil is sitting there TELLING you its evil you choose to ignore it.

Son, willful ignorance is a crime

Answer 3

you are the biggest retard contained in the international in case you think of Bush achieved the 9/11 assaults. because of the fact he rather wanted to kill 1000's of people. you're rather the biggest dumbass there is. Conservatives are not rascist. that's that straightforward. And why do human beings think of Bush is stupid. Why do no longer you attempt to run this united states of america. He did what he believed became perfect for this united states of america, some stupid human beings (like the guy who published this question) ought to interpret that as stupidity.

Answer 4

I completely agree with you. But you'd do better by using the scientific and political evidence presented by scholars of which I've listed below, otherwise you're going to get more answers like the ones above: "Are you insane!!11@!???". But, judging by the vulnerabilty of any people when it comes to believing there governments, this is to be expected.

Help get the word out people. Encourage critical thinking!

Answer 5

Uh, where's the THEORY?

I'd concede that Musharraf's announcement today of a 'peace agreement' with pro-Taliban elements on the Paki side of the Afghan/Paki border is disturbing. Seems he's content with peace in his land (ostensibly keeping the heat off himself) while giving extremists free reign to plot, finance and execute terrorism abroad. Great allies we have.

You offer NO PROOF of complicity, direct or indirect, on the part of the government for the 9/11 attacks. You infer that the government approved the use of commercial aviation, piloted by (well, who?), in a suicide attack on federal buildings (the Pentagon no less) and the WTC. This was all coordinated and funded by the government you say? HOW? Where's your proof?

Your distinction between democracy (a form of government) and a republic (a structure of government) is more confusing than informing, please clarify.

The invasion of Afghanistan toppled the CONTROL of that country by extreme Islamic elements, significantly funded by OBL. The invasion of Iraq toppled CONTROL of that country by extreme despotic elements (Husseins), significantly funded by France, Germany, Russia and the UN. The invasion of Lebanon by Israel brought international attention to the co-opting of the Lebanese government by none other than the Iranian government itself. Now Sunni nations in the gulf are throwing billions into rebuilding to counter the Shi'ite/Hezbollah influence, and ensure Lebanon's government responds to its people and neighbors, rather than to Tehran. Iran's nuclear hemming and hawing are indicative, just as Saddam's was, of a program that is active, accelerated and dangerous to Iran's neighbors and to the Western democracies that are challenging Iran to drop its nuke aspirations.

That being said, the underlying issue is that a lot of OIL resides in lands that are in turmoil, and have been for centuries. Placing American assets in those lands gives pause to those who wish to use OIL to blackmail America and the EU. No American should stand for that kind of blackmailing, and placing our forces in areas that aren't accustomed to democracy is a risk, but so is the discourse of 'disengagement' coming from the Democrats, who think that leaving the Middle East would resolve the Arab and Persian distaste for America. Bush already tried that disengagement tactic for the first 8 mos. of 2001. The disengagement led to a blindsiding crystallized by the 9/11 attacks. There is no easy solution, and saying that Americans were ultimately responsible for acts committed by radical Muslims can only be true if stated in the context of our oil consumption as funding mechanism for terrorism (which it is). If we're going to spend money on oil, we should be sure that whoever receives such funds does not USE such funds to attack us. That's why there are boots on the ground in the MidEast. Denying this simple and overt policy of resource and defense command is doing a disservice to the public and is glaringly exploiting the lack of facts and intelligence applied in your argument.

Answer 6

Nice theory. I'm compiling a book of all the truths surrounding 9/11.

I'm on page 127 and counting. If anyone has any more "truths", post 'em.
Haven't found any duplicates, so far. All original.

Answer 7

I think you need to flesh out your theory a bit. Give it some facts to support your hypotheses. Maybe post some links so people can actually do some research for themselves.

In the meantime its just another conspiracy theory... sit in a darken room with your tin foil hat on so the men in black helicopters can't read your mind.

Answer 8

At this point and faced with the documented evidence of:

THERMATE
BOMBS GOING OFF EVERYWHERE
FREEFALL INTO FOOTPRINT
DETONATION SQUIBS
SMOLDERING POOLS OF MOLTEN STEEL FOR WEEKS
KRONGARD INSIDER TRADING ('PUTS' ON UNITED AND AMERICAN)
BLATENT BLDG 7 DEMO-IMPLOSION
SILVERSTEIN'S "PULL IT"
PEOPLE WARNED NOT TO FLY
PROVEN FAKE OBL TAPES
7 OF 19 ALIVE
NO ARABS ON ANY FLIGHT MANIFESTS
NORAD STAND DOWN ORDER
CNN REPORT OF "NO PLANE AT PENTAGON"
RUMSFELD ADMITTING A MISSILE HIT THE PENTAGON
RUMSFELD ADMITTING FLT 93 WAS SHOT DOWN
MULTIPLE SIMULTANEOUS WARGAMES ON 9-11 OF THE EXACT SCENERIO
FEMA'S ARRIVAL TO LOWER MANHATTAN ON SEPT.10TH
PNAC'S PUBLISHED NEED FOR A "NEW PEARL HARBOR"
SS NOT REACTING TO GOAT READING CHIMP TARGET
OPERATION NORTHWOODS
THE DOWNING STREET MEMO
BUSH'S DIARY ENTRY 'NEW PEARL HARBOR'

ANYONE STILL CLINGING TO THE BUSHCO ISSUED FAIRYTALE IS EITHER A DOWN SYNDROME VICTIM OR SOMEONE WHO WOULD FOLLOW BUSH'S LIES TO THEIR GRAVE.

THERE'S NO MORE DEBATING

Answer 9

This sounds like one of those ideas that sounds really deep and meaningful... when you and your buddies are taking hits off a bong...

But sober people with jobs don't understand what you're saying because you say that you have a theory, but then tell us what it is.

Answer 10

there are books written on this subject. one that i found especially informative: Another Pearl Harbor, by David Ray Griffin... here is an online copy of the book (it is an clear, concise, eye-opening, informative, and a little scary if true)
http://physics911.ca/Griffin:_The_New_Pearl_Harbor