Look at this "not so shocking" statistic of the national debt over the last 60 years... http://zfacts.com/p/318.html
Is there is any way to do background checks on cantidates for the administrative branch to make sure they have no affiliation with any Bush family business partners?
2006-09-06
07:17:01
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Bush Whacker
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Government
If bildymooner had read the site he would have seen this:
Whose National-Debt Numbers?
The data plotted here were taken directly from the White House web site and plotted without modification. For details, see (Source).
2006-09-06
07:32:02 ·
update #1
It's hilarious in today's context that Reagan said this in the White House article you passed on to us:
"By 1960 our national debt stood at $284 billion. ... Today the debt is $934 billion. ... We can leave our children with an unrepayable massive debt and a shattered economy."
"We can leave our children with an unrepayable massive debt and a shattered economy"... He says it like it's something that he's striving for and it's a good thing, a Republican thing. That's just about what he and Bush One left Clinton with, too. One trillion dollars in debt over twelve years.
I wonder what Reagan would say about Bush's boy leaving us with an 8.7 trillion dollar national deficit in just 5.6 years, nearly all of which was borrowed from the Red Chinese so that the elite could enjoy the Repeal of the Death Tax (one trillion dollars per year) and the repeal of the dividend tax (six hundred billion dollars per year.) These costs would be hidden by spending one trillion dollars over five years on National Defense and a bogus war in Iraq, paid for by everyone EXCEPT for the rich. (Priceless.)
Old Ron would have had a wet dream. A long, nightly series of them.
I propose a simple hillbilly-remedy background check for administrative candidates. Invite them each separately to a funeral for a poor person who had died as the result of a terrible disease or from a certain unpopular war in the Mid East. Leave the potential candidate alone in the same room as the dearly departed and the donation jar, but with a hidden camera trained on the room.
If they put their own money in, even only a dollar, they're an independent or a true democrat. If they swipe a few dollars or more, they're a republican or a store-front variety democrat. The more money is stolen, the higher the level of Conservative they are.
If they steal all the money right down to the coins on the corpse's eyes, they have an affiliation with the Bush family or they soon will.
2006-09-06 08:02:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
hmmm...I know that some documents are in the public domain...it may actually be easier to search through the tax records of the business partners to find out this information--if the companies are hiring or donating or otherwise financially affiliated with any candidates, it should be in the returns, or other public business records.
I wouldnt't worry about all that, anyway, because Bush will probably figure out a way to postpone the presidential election, citing the disarray of the world or something. He's good at breaking laws when it benefits him.
2006-09-06 07:22:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by LA 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
the president in 2008 is going to be bush... JEB bush
1) his wife is mexican/latin/hispanic. W. proposed amnesty for illegals. he has a strong base with the mexican people in the southwest and CALIFORNIA
2) W. is strongly entrenched in TEXAS (he was the governor there before he was president)
3) he will pick a VP candidate (guilani, pataki) from NEW YORK
4) he is the governor of FLORIDA
those are 4 of the largest ELECTORAL STATES
and the democrats are a buncha of idiots... even though i pray to god that they somehow get big business out of the white house
2006-09-06 08:09:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by da_d0dgers 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
existence themes are continuously the utmost precedence. If our subculture fails to appreciate the cost of each human human being, then none f something else of the themes will be counted. After existence themes, the marriage situation, the conflict and the ambience are the subsequent maximum significant even as monetary themes be counted, they can't supersede the desires of existence, sacraments, peace and health for the international. I do trust that if the former themes were dealt with responsibly, the latter ones might want to be treated besides.
2016-11-25 00:44:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why does it matter if they have associations with the Bush family. Business is business and the Bush's are very rich and powerful.
2006-09-06 15:22:07
·
answer #5
·
answered by bumpocooper 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Besides those numbers being completly false and made up what is your question.
2006-09-06 07:23:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by bildymooner 6
·
0⤊
1⤋