Do you think natural talents are passed down from your parents by genetics or do you think they're taught? Or do you think it's just a mixture of both? And why?
2006-09-06 07:10:51 · 3 answers · asked by Stefan 2 in Social Science ➔ Other - Social Science
"Talent" is usually something that is inborn. You can be trained to do any number of things in this world, but how far you can get in those is determined by your natural abilities. This would be why, for example, two people who've taken the same dance class since they were 3 can have completely different abilities despite identical training and experience. One of them will simply have more talent than the other, and will be able to do more with the training they've received.
2006-09-06 07:23:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I consider "natural talents" those talents you are born with so thus they aren't taught. We can be taught to use those talents so that we develop them. Sometimes alert people see those talents in us as youngsters and gently lead us to activities where they can be developed.
For instance, I am good with my hands, a natual talent. I developed that talent by learning to sew and I am good at it because of that talent, among other things.
2006-09-06 14:17:41 · answer #2 · answered by Goldenrain 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If they are natural talents, it must be something biological, to put it in that way. It mus be something that comes naturallly to you, not as if your parents tought you how do something and then after lots of practice your turned out to be really good at it; for me that's not natural. But probably if you show to have potencial for something you might develop it with practice, in that case i guess it will be a muxture of boths, but not "natural".
2006-09-06 14:22:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋