Liberalism defined by observation...shallow, non-abstract thinker. Becomes very scarce when any serious situation arises near them.
2006-09-06 06:50:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by C333 2
·
3⤊
2⤋
"...why they are so quick to label conservatives as racists, when the conservatives support Israel and the liberals want the Jews in Israel to disappear?"
Can conservatives explain why they are so quick to label their critics as liberals and attribute certain ideas to them?
"...why they demand that all wars against evil stop, yet whine when they are taken over by forces of evil? Look to France in the 1930's, when liberals won the fight to stop preparing or even talking about war (lest they get hurt, besides, everybody loves PEACE), only to have Hitler walk all over them later."
Can conservatives explain why anything they are fighting is evil? And again, can they explain why they label certain people as liberals? (Oh, well actually we know it's because they love to create fictional double standards...)
"...why they insist that only they have the right to express their opinion and define that as "freedom of speech", and that freedom exists only when THEY and only THEY get their way (to hell with everyone else)?"
Purely imagined. Oh well, at least I can't say now that you don't have any imagination.
"...why they believe that individuals cannot take care of themselves and are not responsible for anything they do wrong, and that the government must take care of everyone (even lazy bums) with the hard workers' tax money?"
I think they believe that anybody may *go through times* when they need the government's assistance. But oh, THANKS FOR GENERALIZING AND MISREPRESENTING LIBERAL VIEWPOINTS AGAIN.
"...why they think it is the conservatives fault that the liberals have screwed up our society?"
That question is fallacious – it presumes that it's the liberals who have screwed up our society (as well as that liberals really think that of conservatives, but hey, that's par for the course for an ***hole like you).
2006-09-06 13:51:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
bill w, I think you should study history alittle bit more before you start spouting out incorrect facts. in the matter of the lead up to WWII it was the Republicans that didn't want to go to war or to even help Britain. Most of the Republicans in Congress voted against: Neutrality Revision 11/3/39, Repeal of the Arms Imbargo 6/30/39, Military Airplane Appropriation 6/22/39, Lend-Lease Bill 2/6/41, Conscription Bill 9/9/40, Extension of the Draft 8/12/41, Armed Ship Bill 10/17/41 and Belligerent Zone Restrictions 11/13/41. Most Republicans were strict isolationists, including prominent people like Charles Lindberg and Henry Ford.
On December 4,1949 Rep. William Lambertson, R Kansas said from the floor of Congress "My second theory is that the President of the United States is as ambitious as Napolean and Hitler.....There is not anybody worrying about Hitler coming over and attacking us. Nobody is worried about Japan coming over here and attacking us...The President of the United States has assumed the position of being a dictator in this land and he is enjoying it. C.R., December 4, 1941, p. 9692.
Rep. William T. Pheiffer, R. New York said from the floor of Congress "While I certainly do not suscribe to the political philosophy of the late Huey Long, yet I do want to call the attention of the House to an amazing remark made by Mr. Long in one of his precient moments. Here is what he said: When fascism comes to America, it will be called anti-fascism...The spectacle of the Head of our Government seeking unexampled personal power under the guise of promoting the defense of totaliarianism bring us the stark realization that Mr. Long was not uttering an empty prophecy." C.R., 2/7/1941, p. a511.
Rep. John Robsion, R. Kentucky said from the floor of the Congress "Let us assert as we have many times that no one has threatened to invade the United Sates or any of our possessions. In fact no country has laid the weight of a finger upon any American or the rights of any American, but the President has had our ships and our men to go thousands of miles to the war and butt into it." C.R., 12/5/41, p. 9707
These are just a few examples of how the Republicans were against WWII. But yet anybody that dares speak up against President Bush is called a liberal traitor. And if that person happens to be a decorated war veteran, their military record is gone after and they are slimed.
2006-09-06 15:00:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by ggarsk 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
there is a difference between israel should not be a country and wiping jews off the face of the earth.Im a liberal and Im not racist in the least, I just dont feel Israel should be a nation.They should live dispersed throughout arab countries as they have centuries.They are arab after all. Contrary to american misinformation their is religious freedom in arab countries.
We need to stop labeling things that dont agree with us as evil and stop just blindly believing what we are told is evil as evil.
No liberal I know wants to stop anyones freedom of speech, just stop misinformation.
Some people do genuinely need a helping hand and some people are a product of their environment.
Conservatives have screwed up alot by thinking that for some reason this country was at one point moral and religious.People were just better at hiding it 50 years ago.You have screwed up society by trying to make people feel guilty for what they believe or for being who they are.Greater understanding and compassion for fellow human being would make this country a better place
2006-09-06 14:29:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by stephaniemariewalksonwater 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
I think you have it A_S backwards! Your brain miswired?
You are the ones that say we have no right to express our opinion and we must be commies, socialist and we should find another country to live in!
It was almost 100% Conservatives that were anti-Israel and wanted Hezbollah, a terrorist group that killed 242 of our marines in Beirut, to win!!
You don't have a clue how our system of economics works in this country do you?
Free enterprise depends on the unemployed! They are the victims of SUPPLY AND DEMAND!! You use them, then denigrate them, while they have a hard time even eating! Most people you talk about are the elderly, the disabled and children! I guess they are lazy bums!!
Who paid for you, or your kids to go to school for 12 years!! It wasn't you!
2006-09-06 13:58:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by cantcu 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
Liberals are generally more tolerant the rupukes, You have freedom of speech, as evidence this question. You are generalizing again. Many liberals work and make more money then you do. And if you look at the last 6 years you have nobody to blame but the repuglicans. They have held the majority in both houses and the executive branch and things sure have no improved for anybody.
2006-09-06 13:46:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
I don't think they really know how the world is supposed to be.
A government HAS to be supported by it citizens (meaning financially) Not the other way around.
Peace is what we all want, but there has to be a limit on other countries to comply.
And yes, it's better to fight other countries in THEIR backyard not ours.
And if President Bush doesn't help people after a disaster in your area, it's not his fault.
He can only suggest helping you.
Your leaders in your district have to officially ask for it.
So you liberals stop voting DemocRATs in office.
2006-09-06 14:01:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by psych0bug 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
Because they are morons. BTW they will deny everything you accuse them of. Never mind it is obvious in every post that what you say is true.
OMG is coragryph honestly accusing you of invalid premises
HA HA HA HA he should know he is the KING
Maybe someday he can come up with a valid premis FOR ANYTHING he says
2006-09-06 13:50:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by SVern 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
Can you explain why you stereotype ALL liberals??? You have no idea what ALL liberals or conservatives think. There are racists of all walks of life. I think you'll find if you can get beyond childish name calling you might find we all have something positive we're trying to achieve.
2006-09-06 13:58:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by carpediem 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
liberals love to name call and taunt. They claim !st amendment only when its their rights being infringed upon.
Libs like Coragryph have no understanding about the world as a whole. Only what they choose to see.
they also love to taunt- just like Coragryphs wife beating statement
2006-09-06 13:48:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by smitty031 5
·
3⤊
3⤋