They say Bush must be taken out of office because he was involved with 9/11. There is no factual basis to an asertion like this. They say Bush blew up the levees to kill black people. They say Bush is friends with Bin Laden. They say all sorts of things that they have no proof of. How can we be expected to have a rational conversation with you when facts are not important to you? By the way did you know that Kerry and Edwards have much more money than Bush? Oh, and did you know that the top 1% of earners in this country pay more than 30% of all income taxes? Did you know most poor people pay no federal taxes at all? I know facts are not your thing but maybe you should do a little research.
2006-09-06 05:31:34 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Another thing. You simultaneously say Bush is stupid and implicate him in vast conspiracies that would require Einsteinian intellect to even begin to pull off. You can’t have it both ways.
2006-09-06 05:37:32 · update #1
Facts and the truth are foreign concepts to them. If it doesn't sound good in a sound bite or if it won't get them votes it is irrelevant.
2006-09-06 05:40:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Okay, the conspiracy theories are not a Liberal political tactic. No respectable Democrat is running a campaign based on Bush being behind the 9/11 attacks or Bush blowing up the levees and destroying New Orleans. They are thought up by nut-jobs that are so far to the left that the Democratic party and the Liberal mainstream basically ignores them and disassociates with them. We don't believe in them either! And yes, it was proven, the Bush family and the Bin Laden family were friends at one time. Osama was the black sheep of the herd. You will probably ridicule me, so I'm waiting for the insults. Feel free.
Republicans and Democrats have things in common...we are all American and we all want what is best for this country. It's the tactics used to do what is best with which we disagree.
2006-09-06 05:44:32 · answer #2 · answered by bluejacket8j 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush like any other president over the last 100 years is nothing more than a figurehead. I am an independent, I do not agree with everything any one politician says. Anyone that votes a straight party ticket is a mindless moron that does not deserve the freedoms we are losing every single day.
Why is it that people like you refuse to look at the assembled evidence with an objective eye. Why do you refuse to accept that there were an inordinate amount of "coincidences" that occurred that day. At the very least our government sat back and did nothing at all to prevent the events of that day.
Yes it is a truly horrifying idea to think that our government would do such things but guess what it is documented fact that ALL GOVERNMENTS are guilty of this type of activity.
Just because you buy the governments lies does not mean that you will not be subjected to its abuse. If anything I am the fortunate one because they will simply have to kill me when I refuse to accept domination by a corrupt government.
Open your eyes, visit:
http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/
2006-09-06 06:04:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush is friends with the bin Laden family!
Bush knew the levies were not going to hold 5 days prior to them breaking and did nothing!
Bush won't tell the truth about 9/11!
Kerry's wife has more money than Bush! Not Kerry! And Bush has a lot of money!!
The top 1% own 90% of the wealth!! The other 70% is paid by those making $44,000 a year! They own less that 5% of the wealth!
From the US Treasury, and the latest figures are 5 years old!
Taxpayers who rank in the top 50 percent of taxpayers by income pay virtually all individual income taxes. In all years since 1990, taxpayers in this group have paid over 90 percent of all individual income taxes. In 2000 and 2001, this group paid over 96 percent of the total.
The top 50% are those making over $41,000 a year!! There are THOUSANDS more making $41,000 to $75,000 than those making over $200,000!
Don't you just love to play with numbers!
Oh, this doesn't include state or other consumption taxes!
And I notice you didn't mention what percentage of a persons income, by salary, went to taxes! Fifty percent of someones income is far different than 5 %, don't you think?
Jesi, grow up! Agreeing is so simple isn't it?
2006-09-06 06:02:31 · answer #4 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They don't! You just lie about it.
You omit pertinent facts from your arguments.
The Conservatives in power have collected more in taxes than all previous administrations combined.
The 1% who pay 30% of the income taxes, receive 90% of the income. Shouldn't they pay 90% of the taxes instead of only 30%?
So you want to tax poor people who have to pay no taxes now?
So you want MORE Americans to pay taxes?
So you want an over 1000% increase in taxes for the poor so that the extremely wealthy can get a tax cut?
2006-09-06 07:20:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are lots of other reasons to remove Bush from office. As for his friendship with bin Laden, no I can not prove it and do not claim to try... I still accept that the incompetence theory may be true.
Why should the poorest people who can barely feed themselves, if they can at all, pay taxes? Obviously they can't, and either way, they don't owe the government anything if they can barely get by.
As for conspiracy theories, you only have to hear Bush's own words to know that he openly lied to get us into Iraq. And if you follow the money, you know it's been very profitable for his biggest campaign contributors in the arms and soldier supply industries.
Some Liberals do accuse him of stupidity and conspiracy at the same time, and that's a good point, but you have to understand two things:
1. He has a staff working for him which is the best political team in the world, and a bunch of crooks to boot. So the incompetence and conspiracy theories are not mutually exclusive.
2. In respect to 9/11 and Katrina, I and many liberals believe that the only explanations are that he was either stupid or it was deliberately allowed or composed by him and his team. We do not believe both. Many believe one or the other, and I personally do not claim to know.
2006-09-06 05:38:01 · answer #6 · answered by Aleksandr 4 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Liberals use a "smoke and mirrors" practice to deflect from their tax and spend practices. Conspiracy theories work well to their base population. Liberals have a twisted maternal instinct that results in their policies of socialism vice capitalism. They feel it is a far more controllable population under heavy government supported subsidies than one that wields authority through the open vote and minimal government. Once under their control it is far easier to further their agendas of the 1% controlling the masses vice the successful leading the population. Bear in mind that political correctness evolved from LBJ's theories of race control through subsidized lifestyles.
It is fact that prior to LBJ's administration the African American community was far more financially successful with higher business ownership than after the implementation of the policies. Liberals view the average American as being incapable of sustaining themselves unless they adhere to thier far left socialistic endeavors
It is correct that Bush knew the levees wouldn't hold 5 days prior to Katrina. That's because GOV Blanco and Mayor Nagin knew for years the levees wouldn't hold. They tolerated a crony Louisiana political system that diverted federal and state funds earmarked for levee improvement into building the gambling boat dock in N.O. and other projects sacrficing the safety of their community. Put the blame where it belongs. Not where you want it to go.
2006-09-06 05:41:47 · answer #7 · answered by Jim from the Midwest 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
much less government, huh? What bearing directly to the Patriot Act or the recent FISA bill. Sorry if i do no longer think of it is the governments company what is going on in my living house, yet those are Neo-Con rules. Warped morals, i do no longer desire you to push your faith and nonexistent sky-fairy on me. it is referred to as freedom of religion. How approximately rather helping the troops, no longer purely making use of them for cannon fodder. How approximately assisting those much less fortunate, that ought to pass an prolonged way with maximum Christians. you basically don't get it. you're so addicted to a single concept which you won't have the ability to be certain the wooded area for the timber. Edit: No theocracy, yet you will possibly desire to push your morals on human beings and get rid of their maximum suitable to freedom? the undeniable fact which you even develop worldwide climate substitute, takes away any validity to any of your arguments. The U.S. is the only united states of america in the worldwide that has doubters like your self. it is referred to as scientific documents and thought, it is not purely some random argument sticking factor. next, you will tell me that evolution shouldn't study at school the two. it is laughable and not even properly truthfully worth the time it takes to argue with you. you have the main suitable to have faith regardless of you opt to, you apart from mght have the main suitable to be lifeless incorrect. Face it, the blind and ignorant Republican celebration is lifeless or loss of life. the destiny is coming, you do no longer like it? i ought to grant you a airplane fee ticket in a miles off places united states of america as I even have been provided such a lot of cases in the previous. My wooded area is the planet earth and the persons that occupy it. My timber are the compassionate lengths i'll pass to with the intention to make specific freedom and liberty of all. no longer purely myself, and my very own freedoms. whilst the two are broadened for the better sturdy, guy or woman freedom will take place. in case you do no longer rather sacrifice of your self with the intention to make the worldwide an stronger place, you're basically dropping a while.
2016-10-14 09:30:08 · answer #8 · answered by canevazzi 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Republicans Believe Lies, Fearmongering and Support the Dismantling of the Constitution: "GOPers back U.S. war on terror, wiretapping, and Saddam's role in 9/11."
Let's be Blunt and Candid,
The Republicans are Stupid, Corrupt, and Unpatriotic.
2006-09-06 05:45:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
The same reason some of those Taliban guys were fighting on horse back,It's all they have got.No one with any common sense pays any attention to those wackos any way.
Jim w. does not appear literate enough to even express his hate properly
2006-09-06 05:48:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Bush is a terrorist and a war criminal that should be removed from office. I hope the corrupt Bush is impeached over all the illegal things he's done, like the illegal NSA wiretappings and the bombing of civilians.
Bush is a bad person.
2006-09-06 05:49:05 · answer #11 · answered by p2prox 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋