why does Pres. Bush refuse to debate with the president of Iran?

Question

i personally would like to hear what the two of them have to say. i think the american people finally realize they re-elected a man who cant eventalk to other world leaders because hes too stupid.

Answer 1

-he doesnt have strong argument in forbidding iran to have nukes
-he is retarded and is afraid the watcher will know him once the smart Ahmadinejad get him like a kindergarten boy in the debate
-israel doesnt allow it. coz it will reveal the truth to the ppl, and ppl will not believe on USA&jews' lies anymore

Answer 2

If your question didn't emphasize your lack of maturity and intelligence; then a better question would be; should a world leader of a democratic country have a debate with a leader of a religious fascist country? What would be the benefit of that beyond giving the leader of a repressive country a soapbox to spout his religious hypocrisy? In other words, would Franklin Roosevelt or Winston Churchill have attained any benefit from debating Adolph Hitler? Of course not ! Therefore, having George Bush or any other American President debate the leader of a religous fascist middle eastern country does the American people no benefit.

Answer 3

Because there is no rationale on the part of US Administration to counter the Iranean claim that the right to do R&D in Uranium enrichment for the purpose of finding a clean alternative to the oil-based unclean energy route, that too under the watchful eyes of the IAEA, is any country's fundamental democratic right and Washington knows that their stand is indefensible and a debate on the issue would expose Washington's ludicrous posturing.

Answer 4

Why in the world would the leader of the free world , regardless of who he/she is , debate a genocidal maniac. The US owes the man NO explanation of Why he should not be allowed nuclear weapons. Certainly your hate for Bush isn't turning you sympathetic to terrorism and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad , the man who has vowed to eradicate Israel?

Answer 5

The biggest problem is that any debate would come down to two idiots (yes, they're both dimwits) screaming that theirs is the One True Religion.

Religion has no place in politics because Religion doesn't compromise, and politics is about finding a common ground. Theocracy leads to dictatorship. That's what Iran has, and Bush is leading the US ever closer to it. A debate between these two would be beneath the dignity of a Jerry Springer episode.

Answer 6

Because the president of Iran is a terrorist. We don't debate with terrorists, we kill them. Also, there is nothing to debate. Iran wants nuclear weapons to destroy the West. It should have been made a parking lot in 1979 but Jimmy Carter didn't have the nards.

Answer 7

Are you kidding? The president of Iran is completely insane!! He wants to Create a nuclear war to bring back the Madi. We need to bomb the president of Iran out of existence. That was just his stall for time. Like going to the UN it is useless.

Answer 8

I disagree with you. There is nothing that two bit 2nd rate 3rd world crazy SOB has to say that I want to hear. He does not deserve to be giving any time by our president. He can debate with his like countries. He also needs to be more concerned about Europe and the UN. You can give the jerk credibility if you like, personally I will be pissed if President Bush gives this lunatic the time of day.

Answer 9

leader of Iran has a better grasp of English language? Just a guess.

Answer 10

Becasue ther "pres" of Iran is a dictator, a facist, a terrorist supporter, and Bush has nothing to gain by debating him, it would only legitimize the Iranian