I just don't understand why you care about this unless you are homosexual. Why does it even enter your mind to be concerned about this? There are all kinds of support groups for all kinds of things. If they don't apply to me, than I really don't care and don't question. Are you afraid that you may have some gay agenda of your own?
2006-09-06 03:30:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by Chloe 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
OK, there are a few things I need to address about the fundamental flaws in your question.
First of all homosexuality is "natural" in the sense that it appears everywhere in nature. (see links below for examples)
It may not be a "natural" thing for you, but that is your preference. As human beings who can reason, and should be above reacting on instinct alone, you aren't capable of generalizing what is preferable or "natural" for others. Unless you're the all mighty being who created everything, but I doubt you are, since you're using Yahoo answers.
Second, what do you mean by dead end lifestyle? That there can never be natural procreation between two men? Who cares. I know a whole bunch of straight people who shouldn't be allowed to procreate and some who just don't want to.
Just because you can, doesn't mean you should. And just because you can't naturally, doesn't mean you won't make a great parent. What about all of the women that are barren. Do they not deserve to raise a child, just because their bodies aren't capable of creating one naturally?
Do you know how many orphans there are in the world? In the US alone there are thousands. Most of the people who can have children naturally want their own. Very few want to take in another child. From whom will these children get the love and care they need? No one. They will go without and some may be able to deal. Others, turn into some of the sociopaths, and other criminals who make the world an even worse place to bring a child into.
So, what I think you're really asking is "Why is there support for the homosexual agenda" If you can explain to me what this so called agenda is, I might be able to help you more.
If by agenda, you mean that they want the basic rights that straight couples get and that they don't want to be harassed about the way they choose to live their lives, then I think there's support for it because it's the right thing. They are people. and really, that's all that matters. Discriminating on any basis is wrong.
Say homosexuals were the majority and were in all of the policy making positions and they didn't want to let you get married because more than 50% of straight marriages end in divorce. Would that be fair? Just put yourself in their position and you should be able to understand. If not, then you're just a bigot. But even you are entitled to your views.
If, for whatever reason, you can't get over the anal sex part. Think on this ... most straight men engage in anal sex with their women even though there can be no procreation. Why is that so different?
If it's fear asking this question, don't worry. They're not after you. Most gay men I know have great taste, and from you're question alone, I'm sure you have nothing to worry about.
2006-09-06 11:13:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Orange 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
There are support groups for that specific agenda. I'm not sure about this question though, it seems to me like you're asking why do people support them. If so, that's a hate opinion. It's not unnatural nor a dead end lifestyle. No life style is deadend or unnatural, if it was, it wouldn't exist. In someone's opinion it might be 'unnatural and deadend' but to someone else it might just be a normal way of life and they're accustom and that's the only way they know. I wish you would have put more details into this topic because it is a really good topic and I believe it should be discussed more because everyone has their opinion and I like arguing about it. :]
2006-09-06 10:36:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Obviously you know not what you're talking about. Being a homosexual is no more "unnatural" than being a heterosexual. I have friends who are gay/lesbian and they lead very productive lives contributing much to society. Try and look at it this way, I'm a heterosexual man. I love women and if someone were to tell me that was wrong and I should change my ways there's no way I could. Try and put it in that perspective for a homosexual. They were born that way and who are you to tell them they are "unnatural & dead enders"???
2006-09-06 10:49:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by carpediem 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dead end lifestyle?
if you're referring to the fact that they don't accidentally make babies, take into account that humans are smarter than dogs and sheep, and understand the concept of "artificial insemination"... something which homosexuals and couples with fertility problems do all the time... so if we were all gay, yes, there would still be humans, it's not that easy to get rid of us
by the way, you don't really think they have an agenda to recruit everyone as gay, right?
or are they going to recruit an army of gays and kill the rest? what's the plan everyone is always talking about?
2006-09-06 10:31:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Aleksandr 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
I cannot understand why people would support a decadent
lifestyle and you are right about being a unnatural and dead-end lifestyle.
2006-09-06 10:32:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Vagabond5879 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
The reason there's so much support for the gay community is because there are SO many people who aren't afraid of them like you are.
Grow a backbone and quit running away from gay people like a little Nancy-Boy.
LOL....funny.....a phaggot calling a homophobe a "nancy-boy".
I just love me.
2006-09-06 10:55:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jake 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Define "a dead end lifestyle".
2006-09-06 10:28:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Pitchow! 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I'd propose you stop worrying your pretty little head about "agendas"
and leave them to get on with their lives. They have enough problems as it is.
2006-09-06 10:41:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
often homosexuals are hard workers
and very intelligent.
many are decent people.
promiscuous sodomy is a detriment
to public health, though.
imo, they should be allowed to marry
as long as they contribute to public health.
promiscuous sodomites should be castrated
and ,`,`,arked.
2006-09-06 10:35:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋