English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The baby Bush was born mentally retarded to Papa Bush and Babra Bush. He suffered form X fragile syndrom and had a seriosu problem with alcohlism which is now even passed down to his daughters. At times he could net even eat prtizlles! In my honmest opinion he has an I. Q. of less than afull blown Down Syndrome Patient How do you rate his I.Q!
Although it is a joke but not far from truth. The CT Scan on Bush Skull read: "He has nothing right in his left brain and nothing left in his right brain! Do you agree

2006-09-06 02:51:56 · 17 answers · asked by pathowiz 3 in News & Events Current Events

The baby Bush was born mentally retarded to Papa Bush and Babra Bush. He suffered form X fragile syndrom and had a serious problem with alcohlism which is now even passed down to his daughters. At times he could not even eat prtizlles! In my honest opinion he has an I. Q. of less than a full blown Down Syndrome Patient How do you rate his I.Q!
Although it is a joke but not far from truth; The CT Scan on Bush Skull read: "He has nothing right in his left brain and nothing left in his right brain! Do you agree ?

2006-09-06 03:13:04 · update #1

17 answers

You really need to stop reading those radical Leftist blogs. It really makes you look retarded. But to answer your question...even though I know that wasn't really the intent of asking it...based on Bush's military entrance exam, his IQ has been estimated at 122.

2006-09-06 02:55:42 · answer #1 · answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7 · 1 1

Kind of ironic, based on your lack of writing and spelling skills that you are calling anyone's IQ into question. Furthermore, you clearly know nothing about Down syndrome...you are simply making an assumption based on pure ignorance. Just by way of a little education, the term "full blown Down syndrome" makes no sense. One either has it or they don't. People with Down syndrome are not referred to as "Down syndrome Patients". And, a person with Down syndrome can frequently have higher IQs than you think.

Now, while you are certainly entitled to have an opinion, it would probably be a good idea to brush up on your typing, spelling, and facts before spouting them off because you have no credibility whatsoever.

2006-09-06 13:00:38 · answer #2 · answered by Smom 4 · 0 1

I agree that you are an idiot. I agree that President Bush achieved the highest office in the land, and what was it that you have done again????? Did I say that I agree that you are an idiot? Even if you don't like him, or have strong feelings against him, you are too stupid to see that it is people like you that makes this country weak. He is in office for a term. After that term is over, he comes out of office. Only an idiot would insult the leader of their country. If you don't like it, why not move to a country whereas you can respect your leader. Did I mention that I agreed that you are an idiot? Even as a joke, it's not funny and did I mention you are an idiot?

My CT Scan reads: "You will encounter many idiots in your life time. Some will know they are idiots and try to improve themselves, and others will not know and will prove it by insulting their leaders." Tell them that they are idiots, and maybe they will improve themselves. And what was it that you ever accomplished again. And did I mention you were an idiot?














I guess you could figure out what my opinion is...........IDIOT!

2006-09-06 10:01:32 · answer #3 · answered by Wise ol' owl 6 · 0 1

Maybe you could take spelling and grammar lessons from someone with such an empty brain. Another case of the pot calling the kettle black. You shouldn't have dropped out of grammar school - but I do commend you for commandeering a computer at the homeless shelter. And for humor, oh my gosh oh goodness, what a knee slapper, I may never walk again, due to the convulsions - really should do stand-up. Wow, what a scream you are...

2006-09-06 09:59:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

George W. Bush is a moran. He should be impeached and executed for high treason of the United States of America.

He was never elected either time.

His IQ must be in the single digits.

2006-09-09 17:26:00 · answer #5 · answered by Jeremy© ® ™ 5 · 0 0

A low IQ for a 50 year old. Probably something like 100. It's tough to find.

2006-09-06 19:09:51 · answer #6 · answered by !{¤©¤}! 4 · 0 0

I.Q. means very little in the grand scheme of things. However, before posting statements making fun of the I.Q. of someone, perhaps you should at least use the spell checker feature built in to Yahoo! Answers. That way the idiot you are making fun of doesn't come across as being smarter than yourself.

2006-09-06 10:02:42 · answer #7 · answered by Wake Cobra 4 · 0 1

I hear alot about how stupid he is. I have seen video clips that make him look rediculous. Although, a teacher told me that his IQ was around 120, and thats about average for someone who went through university, or a business student or something like that.

2006-09-06 09:58:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

bush's iq of 90 puts him in a very good position to get the sympathy and undying support of the 50% of people with iq's below 100, who are patronised and underpaid every day of their lives by the brighter ones [who are still not bright enough not to patronise and exploit the less bright]

parallels can be drawn with hitler, the nazi party, 40% of whom were primary school teachers [see male fantasies by theweleit], the anti-intellectualism of nazism, bookburning, and the cultural revolution of china, both of which revenged the less bright for the brighter paying themselves better, and taking most of the political power

the less bright who support bush are not going to be bothered by bush making a fool of himself, they like it, because they have been laughed at too - the people who support bush support him because they feel they are sticking it to the brighter ones of society for a rare change

the brighter ones can consider the following: why should a person be better paid just because they have been given more gifts by mother nature? - which makes no more sense than paying someone for having received christmas presents, which as far as i know no one has been stupid enough to do - if people are overpaid for natural gifts, the less bright have to pay for this overpay by underpay - they have to finance the overpay

are the brighter ones smart enough to avoid paying themselves for nature's gifts, which is just a theft of equality from the less bright, who are your social and human equals?

can anyone think of any reason why the less bright should be fined, taxed, punished, secondrated, underpaid to fund this overpay for gifts?

besides a stupid and irrational - and dangerous, and unjust - human custom? - only scandinavia has had the sense to oppose this irrational and destructive custom

is it in the interests of the brighter to allow themselves to be paid for natural gifts when it results in anti-intellectual backlash - bookburnings and cultural revolutions - and bush family nazism?

who are those huge prisons being built to house? - i would guess, all the brighter ones who speak out against bushie fascism - the less bright are on the march, on the warpath - was it worth it, those years of laughing at the less bright, those years of parting the less bright from their money?

2006-09-07 03:41:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Bush's IQ was several points higher than Kerry's. They were both tested in the military. Look it up.


Since this appears to be an issue for you, I assume you are happy the smarter man won.

2006-09-06 09:55:25 · answer #10 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers