English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The Brits aren't on board like you keep babbling about. They have taken action to the problem too.

2006-09-06 02:45:55 · 18 answers · asked by Jenny_is_Hot 6 in Politics & Government Politics

Here is another Brit talking about it.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=Ap7pQv.QUKE0FsUbEPGsTynsy6IX?qid=20060906062150AAe1QdQ

2006-09-06 03:13:17 · update #1

18 answers

I kept telling you this, and the neocons had me violated for telling the truth. I have been called a liar by them repeatedly for telling the truth. I have been attacked by them for telling the truth. This part of the problem, and why Tony Blair has to resign his commission as Prime Minister. I live in London and have first hand information your hillbilly's don't have. I am really sick of their abuse myself.

2006-09-06 02:52:47 · answer #1 · answered by Mortica 4 · 8 3

Sorry but you are wrong. And I DO mean I am Sorry, I wish you where right. The Brits are NOT removing Blair.

Blair always has said he would not serve a fourth term, the population is sick and tired of Blair and his new labour experiment and so because of that national unease, some back benchers and a couple of very junior ministers are panicking about losing their seats at the next election. They signed a letter to Blair asking him to set a date for his departure, as he had already said he would leave and the media is only speculating about when this might be and not slavishly reporting the new labour agenda anymore.

This has lead to a panic within the Blairite camp as the Brown camp are getting the upper hand in forcing the issue.

Unfortunately this has nothing to do with the people of the UK having got organised to dump blair, but it is an inevitable consequence of Blair's dishonesty, arrogance and incompetence all coming home to roost.

His rise to the top was meteoric and heroic in equal measure, but founded on a bed of dishonest, delusional assumptions so his downfall is slow, painful and pathetic. He is a risible, miserable, pathetically weak human whose ambition has only been matched by his ego. This is to hide his enormous inferiority complex and his seething hatred and envy of anyone who can do well for themselves in spite of government interference. He is a stalinist control freak on the one hand to balance the childlike petrifying fear he has that he will not be good enough or not be liked on the other.

The man is pschologically unfit to hold office and the sooner he is gone and takes the rest of the labour party with him (which he is desparate to do) the better.

2006-09-06 10:07:32 · answer #2 · answered by kenhallonthenet 5 · 1 0

LoL

Love the way people just want to lash out. Blair is retiring office, and for good. he may do some guest speaking gigs and what not but hey, i would to for 60K a speach.

Bush had his faults. Clinton had his faults, Bush Senior had faults and Reagan had faults. What makes you better?

I am by no means a Die Hard Bush supporter, he F***ed up a few things like education, tax and immigration reform, but I am still upholding my Commander in Chief. America voted him into office for two terms, and yet people still sit there and cry conspiracy.

What really pisses me off are jackasses that never even voted saying **** about Bush.

The next President better come in with some Balls is all I can say. If we get some Sandal flappin, tree huggin, granola eating prairy fairy, we are gonna be in a world of ****....

2006-09-06 10:08:50 · answer #3 · answered by Q-burt 5 · 2 0

The neoconservatives will never admit that the decision to invade Iraq was:

1. A wet dream entitled 'Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm'. This paper was written a decade ago in line with Israel's 'vision' for a new Middle East. All those in the current Bush adminstration are signatories to this paper.

2. A catastrophe. Over A HUNDRED THOUSAND Iraqi deaths, but then again, the pentagon 'doesn't do body counts'

3. Has reduced Bin Laden to tears from laughing. He no longer needs a message to recruit the next generation of suicide bombers. The invasion was the best thing he could have hoped for.

4. Any favorable view of America in the Arab world has been flushed down the drain. According to one poll, 99% of Jordanians despise the U.S.- this is a country seen as one of America's closest allies.

5. Was based on the mother of all whoppers. They took advantage of American fears and concocted one of the biggest lies in U.S. Political history. Iraq was never a threat. Even Arab leaders were desperate to convince Bush that Saddam was nothing but a caged animal.

6. WAS TAKEN DESPITE THE FACT SADDAM OFFERED TO LEAVE IRAQ IN A MESSAGE DELIVERED TO RICHARD PERLE THROUGH A LEBANESE INTERMEDIARY

Across the pond, The Brits here are becoming increasingly embarrassed about Bliar's close relationship with Washington. It took a real turn for the worst during the G8 Summit when Bush, stuffing his face, blurted out 'Yo Blair!' Like you said, the Brits are NOT on board and Blair is finding himself increasingly isolated-especially after today's resignation of 6 officials within his party. He knows that the British public no longer have an ounce of respect for him. If only reality would pimp smack the Bush adminstration as well...

p.s. You're incredibly adorable!!

2006-09-06 10:27:45 · answer #4 · answered by Billy J 1 · 0 3

First and foremost, Tony Blair's government in the UK has little if anything to do with the American government, so I'm not sure why you would make such a comparison.

Second, I'm not sure that your original assertion is correct. I haven't found anything that says that Tony Blair is being removed from office for anything... let alone the war on terror. Tony Blair announced that he will resign in 2007, but that statement does not seem to me like he is being "removed" from office.

Third, and last.... what exactly are Bush's failures. You libs keep throwing the word "failure" around like it has meaning. Please list for me the specific failures and the standard by which you are using to label them as failures.

2006-09-06 10:00:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

Well, you may be hot, but smart isn't one of your characteristics. Blair has been in power since the Billy Bob Clinton years and is retiring. Bush on the other hand is leaving office after '08 as is appropriate for a successful president. We can only hope that whoever replaces both of them has the same balls.

2006-09-06 09:54:15 · answer #6 · answered by Colorado 5 · 3 3

Neocons don't like Brits.

2006-09-06 09:48:27 · answer #7 · answered by badkitty1969 7 · 1 0

True conservatives are admitting that Bush is a failure and destroying what there party stands for. Its the die hard ignorant ones who will never admit his failures. These are the same people who, if they saw Bush dining with the devil on unborn fetuses, would appluad him and say good job chimpy.

2006-09-06 09:50:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

no one is moving tony blair out but we all had the chance to tell bush to hit the road at the last election didn't we?

2006-09-06 09:48:27 · answer #9 · answered by wildirishrose19522000 5 · 4 1

well i didn't hear that the brits were removing tony blair but if they do them I'm glad to hear it and as far as bush's failures well arn't they self evident so why waste the time

2006-09-06 09:55:44 · answer #10 · answered by matthew_yelle 2 · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers