A suggested by media speculation. Mr Blair has caused a great deal of damage to many long standing institutions and conventions in the United Kingdom. A further ten months would provide him with more opportunity to cause further havoc.
As for his stand with GWB`s aggresive foreign policies also makes him co-conspirator as a War Criminal.
The sooner he goes the sooner the British forces serving in the Iraq & Afghanistan debachles return home.
2006-09-06 02:29:52 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
"A week min politics is a long time" said a former British Prime Minister.
A further tens months of Blair`s administration would seem like eternity.
2006-09-06 02:33:36 · update #1
Yes, he should have gone ages ago, but he will have to be pushed.
He is still trying to hang on in spite of all the odds.
2006-09-06 02:34:28 · answer #1 · answered by Nothing to say? 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only if he takes the rest of his cabinet onto the stand in a war crimes tribunal, or at least the rest of his cabinet with him. He is the weakest Prime Minister in living memory, delusional, paranoid, discredited and dishonest to the core. sleazy, debased, and utterly corrupt, prostituted to foriegn powers he has only brought shame to this nation.
How anyone in the labour party can put any shred of hope in Brown is beyond me. He stood by and supported every single disastrous policy Blair has created. He is so massively tainted by Blair and the entire new labour failure that the whole labour party is finished as a political force for at least 10 more years.
Blair should go to the Queen and ask for an immediate dissolution of Parliament and call a fresh general election.
The electorate NEVER voted him in, 37% of a 60% turnout is not a mojority in anyone's book, the undemocratic, fixed seating system in a first past the post election gave him a hollow win at the General election. that means only 22% of the entitled electorate voted for his party and he is far less popular now more people have seen through his blatant lies.
2006-09-06 02:41:54 · answer #2 · answered by kenhallonthenet 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I agree with what you say however i do not believe that Tony Blair should go just yet because!!!
1. Gordon brown would be just as bad
2. There's been a real shift in people's beliefs and ideas and it
is now time to call an early general election because this
Government and party (Nerw labour) Are too busy fighting
on another to pay any attention to the rest of the country
just as no one believes them any longer.
So really ... They should all go as they will next election! And may i say i voted new labour first time, as i always did vote labour if new labour put me off voting for them ever again.
2006-09-06 02:39:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
TB is no fool. He resisted specifying a departure date precisely because he knew it would paralyse him. He knew he would lose control of events and have no prime ministerial authority to speak of. It has happened - junior ministers writing to the boss and telling him to go must surely be the most humiliating thing to happen to a person who once had an iron fist round his party's neck.
Blair is now a dead man walking. If we know he won't be PM for more than the next twelve months, how can we listen to him telling us what he intends to do if he won't be around to carry it through? How can he propose legislation in the Queen's speech this autumn if he won't be the chap steering it through parliament? 31 May my foot - he'll be gone before Christmas.
2006-09-06 02:42:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Don,t Panic the longer he and his bunch of Twisting , Lying , Back Stabbing , Tax Mad Bastards stay , the British Electorate will surely realise what a Vile shower of Bungling , Self Seeking Tossers are posing as a Government. and if there are any Indiginous British people left ,and if this Government hasn,t finally handed over the country to the ever growing hoardes of Immigrants , Legal and Illegal , we can start the long journey back to reclaiming and rebuilding our Beloved Country
2006-09-09 03:34:53 · answer #5 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes absolutely. The man is a menace. Ok so I guess the rest of the party is not much better but Tony Blair is an incompetent idiot
2006-09-06 02:56:17 · answer #6 · answered by Moth 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say that in such a high standing position he needs 'hand over' time to his successor, that having been said i feel that his resent absence during the terror plot proves to the UK that actually we don't need him and when he is here he causes chaos. He should be outed now, to be honest i dont understand how he stayed in power after the general election.
2006-09-06 02:55:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think he should and was astounded to see the extracts from the leaked Downing Street memo about plans for his final phase in office. It was all about what is best for TB and not a thought given to what is best for the country or indeed the Labour Party. I think the clear message here is that TB does not want Gordon Brown to succeed him and is desperately scrambling around for someone who will continue his crusade.
2006-09-06 02:38:11 · answer #8 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The electorate voted in Labour with Blair as leader so why do a bunch of whinging cabinet members think they are above the electorate in trying to get him replaced early..i think (whether you like him or not) he has a duty to stay the full term
2006-09-06 02:40:34 · answer #9 · answered by Lone Wolf 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
yes i agree and infact his party should leave power as labour is and always has been a high tax high waste government with a pr stunt every few days, and they also strive to keeps hard woking families stay hard woking and put legislation to prevent them bettering themselves, so they can work real hard and keep paying an over spending and high waste high tax gov.
2006-09-06 02:39:54 · answer #10 · answered by stephen488@btinternet.com 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋