as it comes into the mess from this administation as a devertion with company's already staing mass reduction in work force I was shocked to hear yesterday that a company was going to reduce its work force by 10,000 jobsso that it can save 3 billon dolllars a year starting in 2008 go figure the reasoning behind that strong arm tactic any veiw on the timing of the anouncement would be welcomed on why in 2006 a company would declare such a blatent show of force before an election that threatens to deminish the ruling partys reign in office ?
2006-09-06
01:03:21
·
7 answers
·
asked by
matthew_yelle
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
ok here we go again if you see a post that you dont like you attack it when clinton was in office foreign relations were solid while clinton was in office there was a surplus not a deficit while clinton was in office the only thing he could be attacked on was his moral issues and as i remmember she was a willing participent so what was the problem and an otherthing what conspieracy and my grammer and spelling are not the point the question is about politics not personal attacks I feel that the jobs wont really be lost I believe it is a scare tactic delibratly layed out this far in advance so that enron companies of this administation will keep there political strings attached by saying that if there is a change in the policies then we willl retaliate by increasing unemployment at a time when the working class will need to have a stabile income and please fell free to respond to my horible grammer and spelling and dont address the question its typical behavior in politics
2006-09-06
01:32:43 ·
update #1