They are both bad.
2006-09-06 01:04:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Gone fishin' 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Osama and George are two emblem on the same coin. The latter is leader of the most powerful military power in the world and believes in the use of that strength for the most obnoxius and concocted reasons. with the backing of the media and powerful allies his evil deeds are always justified in the name of spreading civilization and democracy,and never seen in the context of crimes against humanity.The wealth of his country and the influence or control that gives him enable him to determing who should be giving assitance. As a result the rest of the world most of whom are beneficiaries of his good will are at times alarmed by his excesses only grumble quietly and not openly for fear repercussions whether economically or politically.
Osama is an ideologue like Bush,vilified by the press and believes because of the posture taking by western media, nobody is even intersted to listen to his side of the story.Consequently his method in letting the world listen to his side is so horrible that even those that may have ears to listen are affraid.In the pursuit of their objectives they express no remorse, no regrets,and take pride in the aftermath of their actions-Sept 11,invasion of iraq. Bush governs a democracy and is host to the biggest international organization-UN,with powerfull allies one expects him to know better and to believe in diplomacy rather than an eye for an eye. Ignoring this tenets makes Bush bad than Osama,
2006-09-06 08:52:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by fatherbarrie 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
The thing that I constantly wonder-We have the most advanced technology and military ever and on the face of the planet, but we have not been able to find a man living in some caves in Afghanistan or Pakistan for 5 years. Yeah, right!
2006-09-06 08:06:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Many, even perhaps most, people are good. However, Osama bin-Laden and George W. Bush are both of them are brutal, evil, sociopathic, remorseless, bloodthirsty men.
And moreover, they are clearly each others' best friends: neither would be able to get away with half the crap each gets away with without the other to act as bogeyman and scare ordinary people into supporting ludicrous, criminal, inhuman behavior.
Both prey upon fear and anger in others to build up their own power. Both are vicious narcissists.
The world would be a much better place with both of them out of power entirely.
2006-09-06 08:10:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by snowbaal 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
osama to his ppl
and Bush to his
in both cases the subject in question is good and evil, depending where you are in the world
although, Bush is from where i stand a better person that osama.
2006-09-06 08:06:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dawn C 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Bush, no doubt about it. He's not perfect, by ANY stretch of the imagination, but bin Ladin is a cold-blooded murderer.
2006-09-06 08:48:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bushama Bin Stealin?
2006-09-06 08:07:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by moebiusfox 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Bushama Bin Stealin! lolz u rock Senor Yump!!!
Both are the face of evil!
2006-09-06 08:09:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Babs 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
primarily the mistake is on bush.americans had stimulated osama during the problem in africa.but now they are blaming bin laden.Actually what bin laden did was not correct.he had killed thousands of people.
2006-09-06 08:26:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Aravinth t 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well bin laden is the worst because he targets civilians where as bush attacks military targets but doesn't care how many civilians die in the process.
2006-09-06 08:05:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Pretty stupid question but what do you expect from a commie lib? Bush of course!
2006-09-06 09:19:14
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋