2006-09-05 23:53:38 · 12 answers · asked by kelvin m 1 in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
its called adoption
2006-09-05 23:56:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Genetic material from two men and create either a male or female child, but they would need a carrier medium, a woman or artificial womb, such as was successfully tested a few years ago with a lamb. Male cannot be carriers, they don't have the muscular structure, or the proper hormone producers. Female shave 24 more muscles in the abdomen than men. They also don't have kidneys that can handle the extra load.
As for marriage, that is a political issue, left to politicians. One just has to remember that homosexual are not only sexual orientation besides heterosexual. If homosexuals gain the right to marry, then other orientations could also demand the right, including the sexual orientation that causes a person to be attracted to children. It was designated as an orientation in the exact same manner that homosexuality was designated. Through a vote by the attendees of a national conference of the American Psychological Assc. at their conference in San Diego in 2001.
2006-09-06 07:00:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's a fallacy, the human race would cease to exist and the entire society would become destroyed because of the ridiculous antics of a tiny group. A valid marriage can only be between a man and woman, and this was affirmed in about 15 states who recently "just said no."
2006-09-06 06:58:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
being human gives us choice but as we all know there are certain things we have absolutely no control over and our prefered partners sex is one of them,,we can deny,pretend but we always know the truth about our sexual orientation,now imagine if .5% of the population had two noses,,and the norm was for tissues to be limited to one box purchased at a time,two noses needs more tissues but,,outcry,, its not normal,,should two nosed people have to go without just because one nose doesnt agree? the same thing,,it is not a bad thing and all people have a right to love and happiness,commitment is something required in most long-term relationships so personally i think gay,lesbian,third gender should have the same marrital rights as anyone else,,including 1 wife screwing another wife for half of everything at the divorce,,seems fair.
2006-09-06 07:02:19 · answer #4 · answered by lex 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First it's not marriage at all. It's two mentally messed up people coming together and pretending to be some type of couple. They are just fooling themselves that this is normal and an expression of love. Mental illness isn't love.
2006-09-06 07:07:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No objection, but marriage is defined by the Bible and prohibts same sex union, so if they do get "married" think it should be a civil partnership and marriage should be reserved for religious hetrosexual couples in their chosen place of worship.
2006-09-06 06:58:55 · answer #6 · answered by Breeze 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Adoption is wonderful. Now a days children are very lucky if they have 2 parents, together, under one roof taking care of them...be it same sex or not.
2006-09-06 06:57:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am sorry in the Bible it says that Adam was created for Eve(woman) and to go fourth and bear fruit ,It was not Adam for Steve or vice versa. Man was made for woman, and woman for man!
2006-09-06 07:02:52 · answer #8 · answered by cricket 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Great question to give to your congress man , not here man .
2006-09-06 07:13:19 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
WHAT!!!!
a man can NOT marry another man!!!
no, never
2006-09-06 06:59:18 · answer #10 · answered by timestamps 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋