2006-09-05 23:53:24 · 11 answers · asked by FreakGirl 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
I'm not sure anymore. I used to be for a Republic in the UK but I fear what the Monachy would be replaced with. Look at the US! And we all need the upper-classes to have a laugh at now and then. Their names are often funny and they don't know how to open a tin of beans, I have problems keeping my lawn in good nick, they have probloms with the turf on the polo pitch... I like that.
2006-09-06 00:05:43 · answer #1 · answered by billofthebailey 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Become a republic. People keep trotting out the same unreasoned , unthought out arguements for keeping the monarchy and they keep being discredited.
Additional. Just seen the comment by answerer 4. NO maybe people dont want a president like bush but at least you can get rid of him that is the advantage of a republic over a monarchy. Image if Bush was allowed to keep the job for life. Horror.
2006-09-05 23:57:40 · answer #2 · answered by malcy 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
pass study up on worldwide history from the daybreak of time to present day. you would be conscious that historical Greece invented republics. you will additionally be conscious that everybody republics constantly give way. basically placed, republics do no longer artwork. this is a fatally incorrect political gadget. it is why no longer a one survived from antiquity by to the well-known era. And right here and now, look international and you will see republics circling the drain of history. like the U. S., at present in the technique of collapsing politically, economically & societally. pass study up on some contemporary headlines. you would be conscious that Canada's rated as being the worldwide's maximum-knowledgeable united states of america. Canadians did no longer carve this united states of america from the North American barren area just to p*ss all of it away. it is why Canada's a monarchy, history's maximum effectual sort of governance. As for ties to Britain, what you babbling approximately? The UN - and UN President - is common in long island city in the USA. yet no person stupidly accuses different international locations of ties to the individuals because of the fact of that. the U. S. is basically yet another UN member united states of america in spite of what individuals tell themselves. in precisely an identical way, the united kingdom is basically yet another of the sixteen kingdoms the Royals are royalty of. unusual how many human beings irresponsibly get that puzzled whilst it comprises Canada's monarchy.
2016-10-14 09:17:01 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Keep it. What does it hurt? What the hell will that royal family do anyway without the monarchy? You want to see Charles flipping burgers?
2006-09-05 23:58:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Keeping it. Think of Princess Diana (the "fairytale") or her good looking sons. I think it brings a little more Live to the boring politics that are going on elsewhere in Europe or in the USA.
2006-09-05 23:58:37 · answer #5 · answered by ? 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Eh? What nation are you talking about me fine sheila?
Us Aussies, for the most part, are happy enough to keep the Queen, provided she don't make trouble.
2006-09-05 23:57:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
keep the monarchy..they make me realize my family is quite normal.
2006-09-06 04:22:18 · answer #7 · answered by shadownurse 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Long Live the Queen!!!
2006-09-06 00:01:25 · answer #8 · answered by Sherry Baby ( Ethan's Mama ) 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It was one of the reasons I went to the Uk or do you want a president like Bush?
2006-09-05 23:56:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Keep, they become interesting every once in a while.
2006-09-05 23:58:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋