how do they justify the claim against the fact that they started it and invaded first, would they have given land back now if at the end of hostillities they occupied land or if they had succeded ,would they now allow the reformation of they Jewish State,also how do they stand on the issue of the land being palastinian when records show the land was occupied by Jews hundreds of years before the Romans and when there profit came about he actualy promoted peacfull living with the jews.
2006-09-05
22:26:40
·
6 answers
·
asked by
Matthew
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government