Do you think 9/11 was an inside job? WTC buildings collapsed like controlled demolition?

Answer 1

NO.

Answer 2

I'm so sick of these idiotic 9/11 conspiracy theories. The buildings collapsed because some savages crashed airplanes, loaded with fuel, into the two towers. I saw the hole in the north side of the North Tower from my Midtown office. Anyone who has done the slightest bit of research knows how the Twin Towers were uniquely constructed. The structures' support was from the frame of the buildings, thereby creating more space on the floors which would otherwise have been cluttered with support beams. Unfortunately, the interior structures could not support the burden caused by the compromised frames as a result of the crashed planes, so the towers collapsed. 9/11 happened because of failed US foreign policy, bureaucratic ineptitude, and arrogance ("it can't happen here"). I hold the Clinton and Bush administrations (and prior administrations) equally responsible. I oppose the war in Iraq and the Bush administration. But these conspiracy theories are absurd. 9/11 conspiracy people: Please dispense with these useless, dopey, and hurtful allegations and move onto something productive. (I'd love to see these conspiracy people spout their outrageous assertions in any New York City firehouse or police station!)

Answer 3

the u.s. is being fed way to many lies by our president. this needs to stop as soon as possible. more people should be aware of what is happening, and i'm glad that slowly people are finding out...

but to answer your question, i am completely sure it was an inside job... by our own government. the two buildings both collapsed at an impossible speed. those planes should have only harmed the top floors of those buildings and the main support beams of the building had not been touched. the buildings actually fell with the help of explosives, that were used to take out the main support beams. some say that the building just burned at inncredible speed, but no. also the buildings were burning at a temperature higher than jet fuel can burn, by at least two thousand degrees, therefore proving that there were explosives involved.

if you could, please find the video "loose change", or "loose change II" to back up what i have already mentioned (plus more)!

Answer 4

It's very difficult to draw any other conclusion once all the facts are gathered.
Controlled demolition has now been proven by physics, and collapse by fire completely disproved.
The fact that there were no hijackers and no planes is also quite evident, once one does a frame by frame analysis of the 'plane flies into tower' video which we all saw on the news, and looks deeper into the subject.

For those who are prepared to make a little effort to discover the truth, I suggest looking at the three sites below.

Answer 5

The reason it looked like a controlled demolition is that the fires weakened the joists doing the job of the small blasts a demolitionist creates. There was no inside job.

Answer 6

You should really stop thinking these kind of thoughts. There was no way the buildings were brought down via a controlled demolition.

Answer 7

I've never seen buildings vanish into thin air like that. (Thick air) Not a desk or a computer left in the whole building. That was not possible. When the buildings collapsed, they collapsed within seconds. There was absolutely NO resistance from the floors below to slow the fall. That is structurally not possible.

Answer 8

Is there any difference between the Asian Tsunami of Dec 26th 2004.
How our creator swipe living human kind off the land with the punishment and destruction of human errors like swiping off an ant hill on planet earth?
With seven times of extra ordinary power on destruction on planet earth.
Do we still want to continue with the ghost stories on planet earth?
Try and decode this Lyrics " Where has all the young men gone......when will we ever learn?"

Answer 9

I believe it was an inside job to give the impression that USA is right about the plans in the middle east. So they already have a reason to start a war in Afghanistan and Iraq. The next seems to be Iran but USA knows that they need more than 9/11 to get into action.

Answer 10

Yes, absolutely. WTC 7 is the tell. If those buildings could come down so easily, and still have moulten steel deep undergound weeks later, they were certainly demolished with high-explosives and a great cache of fuel.

No doubt in my mind. It had to be an inside job.

Answer 11

Controlled demolitions don't start at the top of a building and make their way down, they start at the base and blow up.