now why is it still drooping too low to pester the west asian countries to such an extent that it seems to be utterly failing in every aspect of itsforeign diplomacy
who would emerge as the super power if all UNSC nations veto US' policies & bring up an anti-confidence motion against US, for all its misleadings in its policies.
2006-09-05 18:29:28 · 5 answers · asked by joycyrus83 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
15 more years for china to become world power. 50 more years for india. It is too long to replace USA as economic and military power, but USA is no long political leader of world. France and china are not supporting USA, indians are not interested. UK will leave USA in one year. How long USA and Russia will fight with terrorism without any support? Selfish and arrogant USA is responsible for making UN a weak organisation and losing support of other nations.
2006-09-07 07:06:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
But WMDs have been found. Where do you get your news - The Daily Show? There are still more to be found - possibly in Syria - but they are there - found hidden. Why is "what" still drooping? If things were as bad as you try to state, negative resolutions would have been proposed a long time ago. The UN cannot interfere with our foreign policies. You need to visit your library and get your facts together. I guess I don't get my 10 points from you.
2006-09-06 02:00:00 · answer #2 · answered by Coach D. 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
asked like a true communist....
they weren't looking for nuclear weapons....
who cares about the UN they haven't done anything in 20 years... they should be thrown out of New York...
2006-09-06 01:32:47 · answer #3 · answered by pro_steering_wheel_holder 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The U.S. never was looking for nukes.
2006-09-06 02:51:31 · answer #4 · answered by fatboysdaddy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I truly do not understand this question, and that does not happen very often
2006-09-06 03:12:39 · answer #5 · answered by acid tongue 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋