Bush's good friends in the war on terror have signed an agreement today with the Taliban. Is Bush a unifier after all?
2006-09-05 17:06:55 · 10 answers · asked by cassandra 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
http://wpherald.com/articles/1172/1/Pakistan-Taliban-sign-border-accord/Aimed-at-reducing-tribal-fighting.html --
heddon, is yours a distinction that is meaningful?
2006-09-05 17:23:17 · update #1
today they recognize the terrorists. Tomorrow they will arm them possibly with nukes. Very very serious problem, not just Bush's and should not be taken as an excuse to bash Bush but as the very real threat to our military, and our Allies around the world. Reading the entries above, most of them see it as an opportunity to attack Bush and our current military. Unbelievable that we face a nuclear threat with possibly millions of lives at stake here and overseas,, and all it means is WOW This might cost Bush votes? No clue how to defend our country.
2006-09-05 17:45:06 · answer #1 · answered by frankie59 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Your facts are flawed. They did not sign a treaty with the Taliban. They signed an agreement with the tribal chieftains in an area of Pakistan that is rumored to be a haven for Taliban.
2006-09-06 00:11:03 · answer #2 · answered by hedddon 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
According to Bush; any nation supports terrorists whether directly or indirectly is considered to be a terrorist nation and we must fight them. Taliban Regime supported and hosted Bin Laden, so we invaded Afghanistan. Now Pakistan is dealing with a pro-Taliban militant fraction. So, Pakistan now must be considered as a terrorist nation. If Bush continues to deal with Pakistan, then he is a terrorist as well as per his definition. Do you see the logic here?
2006-09-06 00:44:30 · answer #3 · answered by Mr. J 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It means that, once again, Bush picked the wrong friends. As to "unifier", a so-called ally, Pakistan, siding with the enemy, the Taliban, is hardly unification.
2006-09-06 00:09:10 · answer #4 · answered by Steve in Denver 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
LOL...I knew this whole mess would sooner or later blow up in Americas Corporate Face.
These OIL types underestimated the resolve of these people woefully.
2006-09-06 00:14:38 · answer #5 · answered by dstr 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Agreement, treaty or what ever you want to call it ... boils down to Bush blowing it, again.
2006-09-06 00:28:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hedddon-when did these mooncalves ever deal with facts? They would rather make things up (BS) and throw it against the wall and use it if it sticks.
2006-09-06 00:24:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It means we are loosing in Afghanistan just like in Iraqi.
2006-09-06 00:17:21 · answer #8 · answered by Mojo Seeker Of Knowlege 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it's a good idea, but who knows? I guess we'll see.
2006-09-06 00:08:47 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it could mean that the US will have another terrorist attack..
or, it could mean nothing at all
2006-09-06 00:12:40 · answer #10 · answered by lunita 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋