2006-09-05 12:52:50 · 11 answers · asked by dasniper44 1 in Pets ➔ Other - Pets
With all this technology, you'd think we would've figured THAT out by now... Actually, probably more than we'll ever know...
2006-09-05 12:56:28 · answer #1 · answered by KnowhereMan 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He'd chuck as much as a wood chuck could - if a wood chuck could chuck wood.
2006-09-05 21:18:51 · answer #2 · answered by longislander 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yawn. YAWN.
A wood chuck would chuck as much wood as a wood chuck could chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood.
2006-09-05 19:57:11 · answer #3 · answered by Kokopelli 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Less wood than the times this old question has been on here.
2006-09-05 19:55:11 · answer #4 · answered by Thinker 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he wood chuck wood if he could chuck wood and then chuck some more wood, since you wouldn't chuck wood if you could. neither would i.
2006-09-05 19:56:12 · answer #5 · answered by kimberly k 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The same amount as was answered in the 598 other times this question has been asked. Sorry to be a smartass, but this same question is getting really old and tiresome.
2006-09-05 19:55:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I THINK I remember that some figured it out to be 37 cords.
2006-09-05 19:56:03 · answer #7 · answered by Valeria 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Approximately 187,963,983,293,945,478.7397848775278 trees.
2006-09-05 19:58:27 · answer #8 · answered by Brittney 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
7 tonnes.
2006-09-05 19:54:53 · answer #9 · answered by Phillip M 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Research show that 5.5 face cord of wood per day. Thanks
2006-09-06 14:17:37 · answer #10 · answered by matt 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋