Almost every other country can have them. Isnt it legal for them to produce their own weapons if they feel like it? Since when do they have to obey the USA and Britain and other countries. I know the main reason they dont want Iran to have them is because they think theyll use them against Israel and Israel has said "Nuke us, we'll whipe you off the face of the earth." Israel has the 6th largest pile of nukes...so why do we fear them having them???
2006-09-05 12:09:04 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
if iran would use them against the US or Israel....both countries would use their WMD against Iran and wipe them off the face of the earth
USA- 1st biggest pile of WMD (i think)
Israel-6th
both of them together and iran is screwe3d
2006-09-05 12:15:52 · update #1
writer: you say Iran is like that. but not all Iranians are. Most are but not all. For example:
Iran's past ruler (dont know what they have so im calling it ruler) wants peace with Irsael
while
Iran's current ruler states that the holocaust never happened and that Israel should be wiped of the face of the earth
2006-09-09 08:03:02 · update #2
America is the only country that has used nuclear weapons.
And dont say we had to so we can end WWII. Japan was acutally sending messages to America to try to stop, but Truman wanted to use it for an experiment.
Yet when America uses nuclear weapons its ok, Germany after WWI couldnt have an army, no weapons, and their also not allowed to have nuclear weapons, Japan cant have an army after WWII. But America can still keep making nuclear weapons, and also boss around little countries that want in too because they might be a threat, well look at history
AMERICA IS THE ONLY THREAT.
2006-09-06 13:18:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As far as I am concerned no country should have nuclear weapons...
But since some countries have it,why not Iran too?I think US and Israel are really hypocrites to say to Iran not to build a nuclear weapon,while they still have it...Of course they say they can be trusted...How could we trust the only country that ever used nukes on a civil population?
And I am pretty sure,that if Iran would have the nuclear weapon,Ahmadinejad would be smarter than start nuking every country that he doesn't like...
We fear the fact that ,by having the nuclear weapon,they would start control the Middle East...Witch it wouldn't be so great for US and Israel,'cos they too are trying to do this...
2006-09-05 20:48:57 · answer #2 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
quote you "if iran would use them against the US or Israel....both countries would use their WMD against Iran and wipe them off the face of the earth USA- 1st biggest pile of WMD (i think)
Israel-6th"
Not something I would like to see happen!!!!!! There are a lot of little children in Iran, Israel and the United States.
2006-09-05 12:21:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Israel did not say they would wipe them off the face of the earth. Iran said that.
The entire U.N. decided that it was not in the worlds best interest for Iran to have nuclear weapons based on their track record. Do you think any country should be allowed to go unchecked? If Iran nuked the U.S. you would be crying that Bush didn't do anything to protect us.
2006-09-05 12:14:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Let's look at the non-logical views of Iran. Despite overwhelming evidence, they are so close-minded and hateful as to deny the Holocaust. Holocaust cartoons -- what's next, rape victims? Victims of child pedophilia?
Iran is very narrow-minded. Anything outside of Islam is a falsehood. Do you REALLY want a hateful and ignorant government like that possessing weapons to destroy the world?
2006-09-09 07:46:26 · answer #5 · answered by writer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i don't think you want to live the answer to that question. and almost every other country does not have nuclear weapons, only a few compared to the dozens and dozens of countries on the planet, i think only like 5 or 6 or 7 have nuclear bombs. this is serious, a nuclear bomb atttack could signal the end of life on earth... this is too serious to let just any muslim extremist have it. the survival of the whole world is at stake.
2006-09-05 12:16:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Becuase Iran would use them, they have said they would destroy Isreal and the US.
Nations like Korea and Iran where they are known terrorist are the last people we want to have any WMD
2006-09-05 12:14:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
If you own a gun in a town wouldnt you like to be the only one with a gun? is about the balance of power.
2006-09-05 12:31:26 · answer #8 · answered by woodtigerdp 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
See, all the folks that have 'em right now have decided that only they should have them. You can't simply let everyone have them, they are too dangerous. So you have to limit them as much as possible..
2006-09-05 12:12:01 · answer #9 · answered by null_the_living_darkness 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
because they'll be used to hurt the states one way or another,having nuclear warfare will give them to much say in the matter now won't it.
2006-09-05 12:14:42 · answer #10 · answered by steve 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋