all baggy gang style pants,or any gang affiliated items should be banned in the USA. What you think?

Question

hey yo homie, sups?

Answer 1

Something that you consider to be gang-related might not be for somebody else...if you want to put it that way then anything and everything could be gang affiliated...for example wearing a bandana on your head would be considered gang-related whether you're in a gang or not...and anyone wearing baggy pants would be a gang member....having a group of friends would be gang-related and a group of people who happen to be wearing the same color clothing would be a gang...so before you use those stereotypes and defining it as gang related you should make sure that they actually include only gang members or are gang related before saying so..

Answer 2

No! Once you do that, ALL other styles of clothing will be banned. Soon enough everyone in the US will be hearing the same thing, no individuality. Just the way the country would be if things go they way they are. Have you seen V For Vendetta? Imagine the US like that? Not a pretty picture. Once you ban the clothing style of the urban youth and about 40% of the young generation today, it will just open up the flood gates!!!

Answer 3

I think you are a racist dumb a s s. You don't have to be in gang to wear baggy pants. In fact, out of all of the guys I know who happen to wear baggy pants (because they don't like nut huggers), none of them are in gangs.
What if there was a gang who liked marshmallows. Should we get rid of all the marshmallows in the US? The US doesnt need to ban anything (except for dumb a s s posts like this). What we need is for parents to step up to the plate and raise their kids right so that they don't grow up wanting to be in a gang.

Answer 4

I don't agree with it, but I don't think it should be banned (and by the way, baggy pants aren't only worn by people in gangs). In case you haven't noticed, the USA supposedly gives us Freedom of choice (emphasis on supposedly)! So I'm gonna have to disagree...homie.

Answer 5

then there'll be a lot of angry individuals who'll want to ban ralph lauren polos or vestimenti suit coats because they find them offensive and incendiary, and as a result of the baggy gang clothes precedent, they'll wind up passing it. next thing you know, we'll all be sporting uniforms 1984/eric blair style, and though it would make getting dressed easier and quell judging people on the way they dress, the whole no freedom of choice thing would suck...a lot.

so...short answer? no.

Answer 6

So what do you think the gangs would wear then?

Your idea is stupid. What you want to do is to crime. Oh wait, that's already done! So if gang members already cared about laws, existing laws would work fine.

Answer 7

I dont think so. just because pepole where gang stlyed pants and gang affiliated clothes does not mean there in gangs.And either way pepole would wear it. So should we ban pepole from wearing stripes?

Answer 8

there is a gang all across America that has been screwing people since 1776 they're called the police and they re worse than the crips and bloods combined

Answer 9

yes, banning pants is the first real step in the war on gang violence. you are a friggin genius. finally, someone has come forth to reveal the evils that lurk in our pants. ted bundy wore pants. Dillinger, Al Capone even Charles Manson wore pants. not Jesus though. no pants for him. see?
down with pants!
down with pants!

Answer 10

I wonder if gang members wear shoes and underwear? Should they be banned?