I got an email the other day saying that Sept. 11 was more than just terrorist that it was something more and it posed a few questions that "proved" it so now I am asking all of you one of them....for what reason or what caused WTC tower 7 to be destroyed? The email stated that no planes hit it that no debris fell on it and that it did not come down until that afternoon around 5 something pm please provide any information you feel may dispute this….Thank You I really do want to know.
2006-09-05 08:56:59 · 10 answers · asked by J. H. 2 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
ok so what is the official reason for it comeing down...what does "the man" say happened?
2006-09-05 10:09:30 · update #1
What made those buildings come down? None of the 'official' explanations provided by our government make any sense when subjected to extensive questioning and research. If you are looking for verifiable and well documented reasons as to what made WTC 7 come down; check out this video at www.google.com+google video called 'Loose Change'. Also there is a webpage www.scholarsfortruth.org that offers a whole wealth of info that most people are not willing to believe. Email me and tell me what you think after watching the video or reading the webpage info. I would love to hear your thoughts.
2006-09-09 12:38:06 · answer #1 · answered by Ser021976 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Northwestern's Zdenek Bazant PhD defined incredibly of course the physics at the back of the twin Towers contemporary collapses. no longer something greater desirable than the wear from the impact of two great extreme speed airliners became required. As for WTC 7, jointly as "Truther" web content lie and declare the construction wasn't hit by something and experienced purely some small place of work fires the genuine reality is incredibly distinctive . jointly as that's real WTC 7 wasn't hit by an plane it became hit by a one hundred ten tale flaming skyscraper (the North Tower) and fires interior it raged for hours. NYPd and NYFD radio chatter all day long talked approximately the out of control raging fires on many flooring, the seen deformations and creaking of the construction in the previous its give way - all advice disregarded on Truther web content. at last a extreme column failed with the aid of thermal strengthen. The failure of this column might have brought about the construction to interrupt down whether WTC a million hadn't fallen on it, scooping out a million/3 of the front of the construction. it style of feels to me you're being fooled by politically inspired propaganda. The technology of 9/11 is incredibly sparkling.
2016-09-30 09:10:04 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Debris from towers 1 & 2 did hit tower 7. the building was so badly damaged that it was considered unsafe and was imploded for fear it would colapse on its own resulting in more lost lives.
2006-09-05 09:06:08 · answer #3 · answered by rahkokwee 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The fire caused the tower to collapse several hours after the first two came down...
2006-09-05 09:03:37 · answer #4 · answered by Andy FF1,2,CrTr,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Larry Siverstien the lease holder of WTC buildings told the fire department to blow it up so he can collect insurance
2006-09-05 09:17:33 · answer #5 · answered by Larry 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I thought it suffered structural damage from the other 2 100+ story buildings falling down beside it
2006-09-05 09:03:38 · answer #6 · answered by Pam 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It was a CIA conspiracy hatched when George Washington was president. Don't tell anyone.
2006-09-05 10:31:25 · answer #7 · answered by kristycordeaux 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Ask the person who sent you the e-mail to prove his or her findings.
All these conspiriy theories are driving me crazy. Even IF it wasn't terrorism, we will never know about it.
2006-09-05 09:02:59 · answer #8 · answered by mytrollinid 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
nobody cares why it came down as long as they can still buy beer at the supermarket and furnish their trailor with gadgets from walmart .... but it was demo'd plain and simple.
2006-09-05 09:03:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
It's not tru, I saw it and it was not too long ago after the first one,
2006-09-05 09:03:34 · answer #10 · answered by LatinAfro 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋