i think both babies were in the same amount of danger. mj's shouldn't be hanging out of a balcony, and Steve's baby had no business being around a crocodile. both men were stupid and not thinking of the "what ifs!!"
2006-09-05 08:48:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by pimp c 1
·
1⤊
1⤋
Mickael jacksons by far even if the kid did fall but live his father is still michael jackson he'll never be safe Steve would have put himself in the way of the croc eating his child
2006-09-05 15:10:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by topgunpilot22 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
at least steve irwin was a trained professional, michael jackson needs to see a trained professional
2006-09-05 15:12:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Michael Jackson's baby was in constant danger, dangling or otherwise.
2006-09-05 15:10:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ricky Roma 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
MICHAEL JACKSON...I CANT BELIEVE THOSE CHICKEN ARMS CAN EVEN PICK UP A BABY. RIP STEVE IRWIN!!! HE WOULDN'T HAVE PUT HIS CHILD IN A DANGEROUS POSITION. HE WOULD HAVE SACRIFICED HIS BODY BEFORE HIS CHILD'S JUST AS ANY GOOD FATHER WOULD HAVE.
2006-09-05 15:15:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by PHILLYGUY 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
You are a sicko, but to answer your question Michael's because steve (r.i.p.) was a trained professional, and a way more dedicated father than Michael
2006-09-05 15:12:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
not very nice...seeing as how steve irwin just died
nothing better to do with your time?
2006-09-05 15:08:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Shannon 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Obviously Michael Jackson' (reasons are obvious).....
2006-09-05 15:13:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by skepty 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Probably Micheal's. The baby survived without falling but he still has to cope with his father's face (or lack thereof) for the rest of his life.
2006-09-05 15:09:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by RACQUEL 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Show some respect....Steve Irwin just died....
2006-09-05 15:12:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ali Z 3
·
2⤊
0⤋