If you are or claim to be we have nothing to say.
2006-09-05 07:34:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
42
2006-09-05 07:32:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by wtfnmy22 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Such a conundrum... if you are a liar, you must lie, in which case you would not be telling the truth so you would not be a liar. OR you WOULD be a liar... I would need outside information to determine whether or not to believe you.
2006-09-05 07:31:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by americanwoman22309 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
no because you said you were a pathological liar, which makes you a liar, which means you are probably lying about being a pathological liar but still making you a liar.
2006-09-05 07:30:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by Kokoa 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
No...I wouldn't know it you were telling the truth and would always wonder if you really were a pathological liar.
2006-09-05 07:34:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You appear to be a woman so yes of course I would believe that you are a liar.
2006-09-05 07:39:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Michael 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope cause if you were a pathological liar you would be saying that you never lie....
2006-09-05 07:33:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Knock Knock 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
For one to even admit such thing would make one believe it. But even if it is a false statement told, the fact that you already said so will seal your fate.
2006-09-05 07:33:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by peg 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes....But than i have to say that I'm also a pathological liar and a pathological beliver
2006-09-05 07:40:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by wow s 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes.
2006-09-05 07:34:14
·
answer #10
·
answered by mad 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
well if you was a liar would you be telling everyone that you was. but if i said know i would be calling you a liar. good question.
2006-09-05 07:36:34
·
answer #11
·
answered by katy g 2
·
0⤊
0⤋