It would have saved us money and left a spare space!
2006-09-05 07:21:13 · 37 answers · asked by roy d 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
No. At the moment he is in a living hell, which is what he deserves. This is one person I do not mind my tax £'s being spent on keeping in prison - I hope he lives for many years to come as I believe murderers of his sort do not have an easy time from the other prisoners, which is probably why he has tried to end his life.
2006-09-05 09:04:21 · answer #1 · answered by blondie 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
maybe - if there was ever a chance that he would be released and allowed to do more harm, then he should kill himself now so there is no more anguish in the future - also - he may live each day thinking about what he has done, and loving it, therefore this sick person should be destroyed in order to cause him some pain.
he will probably be on a prison ward where he is protected from other prisoners, therefore he is not getting the beatings that everyone is hoping for
but if he does have any remorse in what he did, then yes he should live and suffer the torments in his twisted sorbid head everyday
2006-09-05 12:17:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
At first I'd have said yes, however I believe that spending your life locked away in the secure wing of a prison, with limited human contact - and only then with people who dislike you - must be a fate worse than death. Doing what he did I think he should take a few more years of prison before he takes the coward's way out
2006-09-05 07:31:54 · answer #3 · answered by Muddy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No,force him to help psychiatrists so the next Huntley gets caught in time.
2006-09-05 08:14:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely not, let him suffer. He needs to go through hell, although I do not like the state paying for him, he must serve his sentence, after all the family of the kids he killed now have a life sentence, so why let him off easily
2006-09-05 08:20:55 · answer #5 · answered by abhit 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not at all. People like these should be beaten to the brink of death, then totally revived to full health, then start all over again until the day they die.
He doesnt deserve to take the easy way out
2006-09-05 07:27:38 · answer #6 · answered by finnykid 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no he needs to stay locked up in prison in a room with nothing only the basic food to suffer for the rest of his life. Dying is too easy, very easy way out.
2006-09-05 07:28:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Steve Irwin dies,..Ian Huntley lives...where's the justice in that..??
2006-09-05 07:23:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
That is the consensus of everyone I've spoken to today.
But the only way that could happen is if he starved himself to death, like Bobby Sands. Or successfully strangles himself like Fred West. Any other way and they will try to revive him.
2006-09-05 08:14:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not necessarilly - he is obviously hating prison and would rather die, so lets leave him there to rot and not allow him the easy way out!
2006-09-05 08:41:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋