Remember.... the focus word is "wrestler" and yes Goldberg does wrestle.
With a record 173 and 0, I say "yes" he is definitely in the class known as "The Best"
How many other wrestlers can actually brag on a record as such that they've never ever lost/been beaten or defeated?..... not too many I'm sure.
2006-09-05 06:40:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by c0171♥ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
not even close. goldberg was a horrible wrestler. he had no moves other than a power slam and a spear. even hogan had a leg drop and a suplex every once in awhile and hogan sucked. kurt angle maybe the best ever, triple h is awesome and the undertaker for his gimmicks alone are better than goldberg.
2006-09-05 05:20:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Goldberg was exciting back in 1998 when he was on his undefeated streak.But after a while he got boring and it seemed that people didn't want to see him.Im gonna say that in my opinion he was not one of the best.
2006-09-05 05:49:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by John G 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
no definitely, 100% not the best. lol i am sorry but i laugh at you to even think so, not for the wwe, he had no commitment and you could tell he didnt want to be there, just take goldberg vs lesnar at wm 20 for example, biggest hype ever and absolutely crap match. best ever, i would probably go for either flair, hogan, hhh, stone cold or the rock
2006-09-05 05:41:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Goldberg was really more hype than anything else. Don't get me wrong I always liked watching his matches but he was more of a showman than a wrestler.
2006-09-05 06:41:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mephisto 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
obviously... goldberg is a great wrestler WWE can ever see......
he is a sort of a guy who has never tasted defeat in his life... even in the wrestlemania matchup against the ROCK he dominated and stole the show
2006-09-05 04:36:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by kimi 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
He got a push he didn't deserve. He's a terrible wrestler and doesn't really put seats in the arena. He ended Bret Hart's career. Can't really wrestle.
2006-09-05 06:52:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by tyrone b 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Undertaker is better. He is a living legend. The tombstone, the rope walking, the casket matches, and the throat grabs; he is the man.
2006-09-05 04:35:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by Tony R 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Goldberg was a punk and should never have been promoted like he was. No skill.
2006-09-05 05:41:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Drunk365 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Undertaker is hell lot better than Goldberg.
2006-09-05 04:37:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋