2006-09-05 03:57:34 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Sociology
It's all up to your personal preference, but the Cadillac Escalade was just named by J.D. Power and Associates as one of the top five "best in overall quality" vehicles for model year 2007.
2006-09-05 04:00:34 · answer #1 · answered by sarge927 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only way I would get a car that large is if my only other option was a minivan. In which case, I'd get the Navigator so the Escalade doesnt' get stolen by hood rats when I go downtown.
2006-09-05 07:16:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
What, you actually NEED to carry nine people somewhere? Think that finding a parking spot is too easy with a Camry? Have so much money to waste that you think burning tons of fuel is fun?
That's all you're going to get out of either one of these, really. They don't handle well, can't accelerate or stop quickly, and have the aerodynamics of a brick thrown sideways. And forget going four-wheeling with them unless you're willing to put another $10,000 into modifications, because you'll just high-center them on something as small as a curb.
In short, large SUVs are the most impractical vehicle on the planet.
2006-09-05 10:09:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why buy either one of those? Have you heard of global warming? Or are you one of those who only cares about themselves? Since you want to buy one of those cars I think maybe yes. But I do not know you and maybe you will change your mind. Oh and it's a waste of money. It's just a car man
2006-09-05 04:09:15 · answer #4 · answered by Scott 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
escalade.... why? because its a freakin caddilac. and caddy's are HOT. <3
2006-09-05 04:05:06 · answer #5 · answered by realtalker 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
neither. they both represent some peoples' sad need to prove themselves. :(
2006-09-05 07:04:22 · answer #6 · answered by barbsmonsta 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How about neither
2006-09-05 04:00:20 · answer #7 · answered by Lee 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋