2006-09-05 01:58:51 · 18 answers · asked by Eata 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Magazines
Well ya know she's not singing now so gotta make some money some how, that and keep the spot light on herself. After all Mr Kfed is working now.
2006-09-05 10:45:31 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think that it is not the smartest thing that she has done. It's pretty gross. If she wants to pose naked, then she needs to wait till after the baby is born ans she gets back down to 110 pounds. But posing nude for a magazine is disgusting in the 1st place.
2006-09-05 10:12:29 · answer #2 · answered by AmsterF 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
She trying to live the pop star life that she will never have ever again. I think it is disgusting and she needs to worry about her unborn baby and little boy instead of trying to make money posing her nude body for people who really don't give a rats *ss to see her naked anymore..
2006-09-05 18:17:59 · answer #3 · answered by angelblueyes200 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oh,my gosh!Yes,I have heard at TV about this but is her choice!Many stars that wore pregnant had posed nude but is disgusting!
2006-09-08 05:01:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
it depends if it was done in a way that looked natural like that birth magazine then ok but in "ok" then thats not right. (but i know at 2 guys who love the look of a pregnant woman)
2006-09-06 18:06:33 · answer #5 · answered by leanne_on_line 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yuckz. Its extremely disgusting.
2006-09-05 11:50:17 · answer #6 · answered by ~Venus~ 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It depends on who poses. Britney is just so not classy.
2006-09-08 15:14:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I dont think its that bad, I would consider doing it. But then again, I havn't seen the pictures yet!
2006-09-05 16:52:32 · answer #8 · answered by silver_daz 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I find her disgusting in pretty much every shot I've seen of her.
2006-09-05 11:59:31 · answer #9 · answered by JB 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
She is disgusting. Trailer trash with money.
2006-09-09 08:22:10 · answer #10 · answered by gramcracker541 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋