English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Secularism = It asserts the freedom of religion, and freedom from religion, within a state that is neutral on matters of belief, and gives no state privileges or subsidies to religions.

2006-09-05 00:35:37 · 8 answers · asked by Better life @ Better world.com 1 in Social Science Sociology

8 answers

Secularism doesn't assert freedom of religion, it takes religion out of governmental policy. But it very much depends on who is chosen to represent the people. A government is as secular as the people who they represent, no matter what the law says. Laws, but also constitutions, can be changed.

2006-09-05 01:52:22 · answer #1 · answered by Caveman 4 · 0 0

Terrorist rarely act because of religion. Religions actually forbid you to do such things.

Also, those "secular" states turned out to be not secular but opressing. In France, Germany, Turkey it is banned to wear headscarves in public institutions, thus they practically expelled Muslim girls from schools and governmental jobs.

Now, if there was a terrorist religion, why would it matter if the state is secular or not?

2006-09-05 01:17:40 · answer #2 · answered by Suzan 2 · 1 0

at the beginning, we ought to continuously understand that there are a number of different circumstances of non secular extremism by making use of alternative than Islamists. for the way some years substitute into the difficulty in Northern eire? i think that genocide additionally must be coated in this classification in that, this is barely a variety of cultural terrorism. for the time of historic previous there have been many circumstances of genocide, and one desire in user-friendly terms seem into Africa suitable now to work out it continuing. i don't sense that violence would be an efficient gadget to apply against the perpetrators of violence, on the grounds that throughout user-friendly terms proves that the only with the perfect weapons wins. So it variety of feels to me that the respond lies alongside a pair distinctive avenues . interior the example of Islamist extremism, i think that there should be a "self policing" being performed by making use of the Islamic community as an entire. they're the guy who could perfect understand the innovations of an extremist, and consequently could have the perfect perception as to the thank you to handle them. in addition they, go through the implications of international reaction to extremist events. it may probable take lots of the international community to cajole the Islamic community to take those steps. additionally, hate crimes, i think are a effect of one community's loss of expertise and consequently worry of yet another community or custom. the sole thank you to therapy this loss of expertise is thru practise. it might nicely be a important attempt by making use of each and every of the worlds developed international places to succeed in out to the undeveloped ones and lend them a hand. so a techniques as taking faith out of government, there's a appropriate reason in the back of this, in that each and every one voters in a rustic might not be of the identical non secular theory, and the sole way they are able to be certain of suitable governance is that if non secular components are actually not a attention. additionally, lots of people accuse the developed western international places of having won their affluence on the rate of the fewer advantaged international places. i think of this is time that the west take a problematic seem at itself and know that there is a few accuracy in those accusations. it ought to not be an person-friendly ingredient to confess, besides the undeniable fact that the sole thank you to progression is that if steps are taken to end exploitation and allow much less developed international locations to progression alongside with something of this planet.

2016-12-14 18:32:40 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

The conflict isnt religion vs secular. It is between those who want to destroy civilization as we know it and those that dont.

2006-09-05 00:57:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

if the tradition of a country don'T stand just on a religion it is possible i think

2006-09-05 00:53:04 · answer #5 · answered by sub-zero ide 2 · 0 0

It's hard but possible.

A terrorist to some is a patriot to another.

2006-09-05 00:41:28 · answer #6 · answered by Villain 6 · 2 0

Saddam Hussein managed that.

So your answer is yes.

2006-09-05 03:01:55 · answer #7 · answered by ekonomix 5 · 0 0

depends in which country.

2006-09-05 00:41:59 · answer #8 · answered by Juan Kassoff 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers