Why limit it to Kerry, let's take everyone in D.C. on a dive trip. BTW I'll be thinking TWICE before approaching one.
2006-09-05 01:26:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Dr.Feelgood 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
How precisely grew to become into he slandering John McCain? He grew to become into talking approximately McCain's political stance on the subject concerns. it is an election regardless of each and every thing, isn't that what your meant to do? So via your logic, only using fact he grew to become right into a POW interior the vietnam conflict we at the instant are not meant to question something John McCain says or does... lots for freedom of speech there Sparky.
2016-10-01 08:14:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by ehinger 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do I think "its pure genius" on your part? NO, I think you sound like some of the small minded liberals on this venue that spew hatred. I think John Kerry is nothing more than a gigolo with a title but he doesn't deserve this. This is just a suggestion, lay off the vodka tonics so you can think with a clear head.
2006-09-04 23:48:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by rosi l 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
Why are political opponents so vindictive? Kerry is finished. You'll get your chance to vote for Jeb Bush in 2008 and have a dynasty instead of an electoral presidency.
If Kerry hadn't run for President would you still have hated him so? He conducted the BCCI investigation. The US kept BBCI from defauding American bank clients. I'm reminded about that woman at the FDA who refused to allow Thalidomide to be approved and as a result was castigated by the medical industry who tried to get her fired -- until the horrible consequences of that drug were revealed.
In the USA people have such vindictiveness against those they oppose. I guess most would vote for a One-Party State and a President For Life if they could.
2006-09-04 23:47:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
Your continuing obsession with John Kerry is pathetic. He lost the election almost two years ago, and accepted it. Or you are just still sputtering with rage that anyone dared to challenge Bush? America is supposed to be a democracy.
And your avatar is reprehensible. Refusing to fight for your country then cavalierly sending other young men to their deaths as Bush has done - now that's cowardice.
2006-09-05 00:30:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dunrobin 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Someone shuld tell him that stingrays carry botox in their tails.
2006-09-05 00:20:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by BrianthePigEatingInfidel 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
If the Democrats thought it was a "party to raise taxes and gasoline prices", they would all come.
2006-09-04 23:45:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
I just don't find that very funny. Some Republicans should go, too. Some of them are just as bad, if not worse, than some Democrats.
2006-09-04 23:54:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
because john kerry was busy getting his hourly botox injections so he can mess up more with our congress...
2006-09-04 23:46:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Come on people, "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you", be nice.
2006-09-04 23:51:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by Aliz 6
·
2⤊
1⤋