2006-09-04 23:16:23 · 12 answers · asked by boo1 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
who actually terrorist...for me the real terrorist is bush, olmert and blair..they should be trial in court for killing the muslims especially in iraq, afghanistan, palestine and lubnan...
2006-09-04 23:28:39 · answer #1 · answered by joe5997 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
It doesn't matter what race or religion they are, it just so happen that all the attacks have been linked to Muslim. And to answer you question, an unprovoked kidnapping and or attacks by a militia not recognized as a military is a terrorist organization, usually under the cover of religion. Now, the butt whooping that follows by a trained and internaional recognized military is the exact opposite. How can you be in such denial? Tell me which came first, the attacks or the kidnappings? If you can answer that question then my young grasshopper you have found the answer. Look at it unbiasely. Every action has a reaction. Nasrallah even admitted that he wouldn't have kidnapped the soldiers if he would have known the outcome. So, what does this mean? Um, well he started it because he wanted to release prisoners. Stop being so Naive. Step outside of the norm and quit letting the media think for you.
2006-09-05 06:26:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's they are just defending themselves.That's what usually Israelis say..Everything they do,it's because they are "defending themselves"...'Cos all the media has done was to show us how the Israelis are "victims" in there and every time an Israeli dies they have to turn everything into an international tragedy...But when it happens the other way around it's not an important news...Definitely the one Israelis killed has done something to deserve it...It doesn't matter if it was just an one year old kid...He deserve it 'cos he's a Muslim...
2006-09-05 06:30:13 · answer #3 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
This is just what I'm saying before the word Terrorist is only address to all muslims.Have you heard of American, British,terrorist or Jews? That 's why I'm asking if the definition of terrorist is different between ARAB & AMERICAN dictionary
2006-09-05 06:23:10 · answer #4 · answered by ? 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Good question.Let us all stop and think about it...Does the media want to show the bad and the good just to support politicians who go ahead with wars killing innocents to make money?
2006-09-05 10:38:19 · answer #5 · answered by gina 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
who thinks the world would be a lot beater without jews and muslims...
2006-09-05 06:23:44 · answer #6 · answered by tsar 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's the war marketing strategy that the Jew owned media has packaged for your consumption.
2006-09-05 10:48:04 · answer #7 · answered by mikeygonebad 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Israel only kills dangerous opponents in battle. Israel does not target civilians deliberately. The terrorists deliberately target innocent civilians.
2006-09-05 06:23:37 · answer #8 · answered by Bachelor boy 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
One mans freedom fighter is another ones Terrorist.
Soldiers do and are guilty of terrorism.
Governments use the words to justify their use of war to get what they do not own.
2006-09-05 06:33:42 · answer #9 · answered by aiddogs5 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
because usa need need enemy for don't collapse and now usa spots muslims enemy, than now western people doesn't care about muslims people and they manipulates media
2006-09-05 06:23:20 · answer #10 · answered by sub-zero ide 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋