Why not just listen to it yourself...
2006-09-05 03:35:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by todvango 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
In the original Star Trek series the line was "to boldly go where no man has gone before". In Next Generation the line was changed to reflect the time and political correctness. Also, it is probably that it was also changed because the business people realized that a fair amount of their audience was female. So the new line had more appeal.
2006-09-04 20:47:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Spiritual but not religious 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The difference between the words in the opening title sequence in the original series and the Next Generation are as follows:
Original:
FIVE YEAR mission
Next Gen:
CONTINUING MISSION
Original:
To go where no MAN has gone before
Next Gen:
To go where no ONE has gone before.
I think Star Trek is a very good reflection of the different attitudes of society between 1966 and the 1990s - just think of the style of Kirk in comparision to Picard.
2006-09-04 20:57:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by KizzyB 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
People are right that it was meant to be more inclusive than the original. In Star Trek VI remember at the end Kirk said 'where no man - no *one* - has gone before'. This may have been a reference to the earlier scene where Chekov referred to 'human rights' and the Klingon woman said this term was racist. It also formed a link between the old crew, whose last movie this was, and the Next Gen crew, who were to be the only ST game in town after 1991.
2006-09-04 20:57:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dunrobin 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's no one, no man was from the original series. It was changed for the film star trek 6 the undiscovered country. How sad is it I know that!
2006-09-04 21:10:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by edwardgrove 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
in the original star trek series it was 'no man' but in 'next generation' it is no one. I assume this is due to changing times ie sex discrimination and the like
2006-09-04 20:55:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by STEVE B 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The phrase was changed when "Spock" read it at the end of Star Trek II (1982) and remained changed thereafter, which included TNG (1987)
2006-09-04 20:50:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by baseballfan 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No "ONE."
In the original series in the 60s it was still appropriate to use the "universal masculine" (man, mankind, etc) to describe humanity. But by the more politically correct 80s this was considered sexist, and so the producers VERY CONSCIOUSLY chose to emphasize -- "No One." Nice question.
2006-09-04 20:47:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Jack 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's been both. First "no man" and then "no one" later on when "no one" was thought to be more politically correct.
By the way, did you know that this famous phrase commits a grammatical faux pas by splitting infinitives?
2006-09-04 21:03:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
original star trek is next man
next generation is no one
2006-09-04 20:46:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by d2pain 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
to boldly go where no man has gone before
2006-09-05 10:17:50
·
answer #11
·
answered by Calamity Jane 5
·
0⤊
0⤋