2006-09-04 20:31:26 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
W H Y N O T
Bush is the 1st President in U.S. history to enter office w/a criminal record.
He invaded and occupies two countries at a continuing cost of one billion dollars per week.
He has spent the U.S. surplus and bankrupted the U.S. Treasury.
He set the record for the largest annual deficit in U,S. history.
He's set the all-time record for the most private bankruptcies filed in any 12-month period.
The same goes for the numbers of foreclosures in any 12-month period.
He set the all-time record for the biggest drop in the history of the U.S. stock market.
Bush's 1st year in office saw over 2 million Americans lose their jobs.
Bush has seen to it that his cabinet members are the richest of any administration in U.S. history.
Bush accepted his largest campaign contributions from his felonious pal Ken Lay, who presided over the largest corporate bankruptcy fraud in U.S. history.
Bush and his cronies used Enron private jets and corporate attorneys to assure his success w/ the U.S. Supreme Court during his election decision.
Bush has protected his Enron cronies and Halliburton pals against investigation and prosecution.
71% of Europeans view Bush as the biggest threat to world peace & security.
The UN concludes that the U.S. under Bush and Israel are the only two real terror threats world-wide.
Bush supports nuclear development and is using depleted uranium on American ground troops as well as the Iraqi people.
Bush dropped out of college.
Bush deserted from the military. Bushes only venture ended in a bankrupt company.
Bushes records of SEC investigation into his insider trading and his bankrupt companys are sealed in secrecy.
No high jackers supposely involved have ever been charged or brought to justice for their part in 911.
He's shown no proof that Bin Laden is guilty of anything, nor does he seek him.
Bush and his administration lied to the American people regarding Saddam Hussains ability to possess WMD.
2006-09-04 22:21:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
rEAD SOME BOOKS THERE ARE PLENTY OUT THERE ON HIS PERFORMANCE. hE IS A DIMAL FAILURE. rIGHT WINGERS ARE GONNA SAY THE ECOMOPPS economy is good and we sure got those terrorists. The economy sucks. They do not lower the price of cars when the economy is good. Unemployment is down,,,BS they use the number of people who are on unemployment to figure that out (don't let anybody tell you different) and people stop getting unemployment after 6 months so they are dropped and not figured in. The number of homeless has gone up significantly. They have not recovered the jobs they lost early on. Conservatives say they are interested in a free market but they are not. Energy has their hand out and get it filled but the conservatives don't want to give disabled veterans decent health care. Going to the VA for health care just gives you a second chance to die for your country. This whole buy low sell high buch needs regulation or they will polute the air so bad you will have to buy clean air from them. Greed can not be our sole aim. Bush is a poor example of being a good leader he is pro merchant anti consumer. The best book to read is "What WE Have Lost" He has not vetoed a single bill that has passed, and over 90% have been written by pro mechant lobbiests. OK I'll get off my soap box. Oh and that guy is a poor excuse for a Christian, if they had a backbone they'd excomunicate him. ok now btu 3wosddkjbrt fdnand on and on
2006-09-04 21:00:33 · answer #2 · answered by icheeknows 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
NO. He's not.
*Bush overstates the case on weapons of mass destruction. When the military found two trailers in Iraq that might have been used for biological weapons production sometime in the past, President Bush was quick to jump on the find as evidence of WMDs, declaring, "We found the weapons of mass destruction." Unsurprisingly, that assessment came a little too quickly. First of all, there were no weapons. Second, many analysts dispute that the trailers were used in the production of biological weapons. But the question remains: even if Bush was right, did we really go to war to defeat two trailers?
*Bush pleads with China and Japan to save him from his economic failures. Bush likes to say that his enormous tax cuts that give hundreds of billions of dollars to America's wealthiest people are job-creation programs. But America has bled millions of jobs since Bush's tax cuts became law, so it's time to try something new. Bush's new tactic? Beg China and Japan to increase the value of their currencies, which will make American manufacturers more competitive. But Bush has nothing to offer in return -- and has done little to make other countries inclined to offer him favors. Instead of making pointless pleas to other countries, maybe Bush should come up with an economic plan that would actually create jobs instead of just putting more money in the pockets of those who need it least.
*Bush starts new public relations campaign on Iraq. Faced with failure, effective leaders change policy. Ineffective leaders figure out new way to sell their current policies. President Bush chooses to do the latter in Iraq, creating a new public relations push to make people feel better about the soldier-per-day death rate since Bush declared "Mission Accomplished."
*Bush uses the September 11 attacks to justify all his policies. Why should we pass tax cuts for the rich? The September 11 attacks. Why should we clear cut forests and let polluters write environmental policy? The September 11 attacks. Why has America lost millions of jobs since Bush took office? The September 11 attacks. Next thing you know, he'll be saying we went to war with Iraq because of the September 11 attacks! Nah, he wouldn't go that far...
2006-09-04 21:02:41 · answer #3 · answered by tyrone b 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No, he's the worst president in American history. He's the laughing stock of the world. Everyone knows he's a bimbo--albeit a dangerous one. After six years in office, he's still not qualified to be president. He doesn't have the knowledge and the judgment needed in a president. He has no ideas, no leadership qualities, he destroyed the country, and like all people named Bush he's started yet another war and killed countless number of people with no results to show for it. Instead of a president for "all of the people," he's been a president for some of the people (the rich). He's really a very weak man who's easily led by the nose.
2006-09-04 20:37:46 · answer #4 · answered by Pandak 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yes and No.
Yes because he is a genine caring person. The type of person that's fun to have a drink with and always keeps you happy.
No because he doesn't have the slightest grasp to the concept of politics and such. Hes made many mistakes which I have forgiven but it don't change the fact that he's a dumb ***.
2006-09-04 20:34:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yes, he geniunely does care about people. He really does and he might not be the best public speaker but everyone has flaws!
And to everyone who critisizes him for going into war... How is ANYONE supposed to know how war will unlfold, day by day? He's doing the best he can.
And to everyone who whines and complains instead of trying to HELP their country. Just wait until 2008. And quit crying so much. It's gettin annoying.
2006-09-04 20:38:01 · answer #6 · answered by Linzy Rae 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
the question should be if hes a clever or a dumb president and the answer is hes as dumb as they come
2006-09-04 20:39:12 · answer #7 · answered by Wesley 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
He's just average.
2006-09-04 20:38:57 · answer #8 · answered by Reflection 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not good b'coz he is bad
2006-09-04 20:34:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
no! because he sucks
2006-09-04 20:37:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋