Depends what you mean by "lliberal on moral issues". They are not all the same.
Recent US elections have been decided on "morality": sexual morality like the Clinton-Lewinsky affair; abortion, flag-burning (conflating patriotism and morality), school prayer, gay marriage, sex education, public religion & religious symbols & symbolism, death penalty, Willie Horton, gun control. These are Red State issues.
It goes without saying that the Blue States are populated with wealthier citizens than the Red States: the professional jobs are there, land prices have made many Blue Staters well off whereas they have stagnated in most of the Red.
It was long ago noted that the more educated a person is, the more likely that person is to engage in Clinton-Lewinsky type sexual behavior. If we extrapolate from there, shall we assume that the "upper middle class" is better educated? I think you need to determined how "upper middle class" is to be defined, and whether their better education is in fact cause of the tolerance.
Those who are unsophisticated in logic and politics and law are more likely to vote impulsively on hot-button issues and not think about possible unintended consequences.
2006-09-04 18:31:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
it is not easy to draw a line between working and middle class at these days. I'd say that upper class is conservative about many issues. Working and middle classes are more liberal.That is just my
own opinion.
2006-09-04 18:32:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's a good stream of thought. But I seriously believe that the working class should become liberal in their opinions of moral issues. I say it is actually an improvement.
Good luck.
2006-09-04 18:23:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Eternity 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
you've were given stumbled on it offensive yet what you extremely must have executed is replied the question and close him up. What you do now, is allow this one slide. yet when he pulls a stunt like that again, then you extremely kick his proverbial butt with a kick a** come back. you're going to ought to comprehend that you're in college now, they prefer to attempt this issues. I used to get indignant yet I realised, getting indignant wasn't going to resolve some thing, truly sticking up for myself and my beliefs ought to. a particular instructor used to do stuff like this each and every of the time, we had some outstanding debates after i desirous to face up for my beliefs truly of being a wilting daisy. It skill, there replaced right into a ways a lot less type time yet good mind workout consultation. Others will take area too.
2016-12-06 10:31:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by kersten 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don;t agree with your Proff.It's too broad a statement.I do however agree with your premise that the working class is getting lax on moral standards.
2006-09-04 18:33:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by thetdw 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, who needs moral integrity? Who needs personal responsibility?
2006-09-04 18:26:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Philosophy Buff 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I work for a living, and i'm sick and tired of being taxed to death, and morals, and common decency going down the tubes. They don't call me for my opinion 'cause i'm always working, and i don't have time to march in protest. but i do show how i feel when i vote.
2006-09-04 18:29:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kathy O 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
To each their own
2006-09-04 18:23:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Southie9 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
your professor is painting in very broad strokes here.
did he/she provide you w/ some examples?
2006-09-04 18:23:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by dr schmitty 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
That would be a good thing
2006-09-04 18:27:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋