2006-09-04 17:21:07 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No a weapon of mass deception
2006-09-04 17:25:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
The Bush administration is keenly aware that nuclear weapons in the hands of terrorists or desperate states pose the gravest potential danger facing the United States. But the policies the administration has adopted to cope with these threats & ow from a set of illogical priorities. The administration’s policies regarding America’s own nuclear weapons have systematically undercut the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which has for 33 years ned the only internationally accepted barrier to nuclear proliferation. In addition, the richest and most likely source of nuclear materials and weapons for terrorists and would-be proliferators is the enormous and poorly secured Russian stockpile. Yet the administration has placed far lower priority on this ticking time than on nuclear threats that do not yet exist.
2006-09-05 00:28:08 · answer #2 · answered by Jamil Ahmad G 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not nearly as much as the whining about his ineffectiveness. THAT is mass destruction we can live without. Remember, we only have another year and a half of his tenure in office. Then, if everything goes as expected (by me at least), we will elect another idiot that will probably make GW look like a Rhode's scholar.
2006-09-05 00:29:37 · answer #3 · answered by Lonnie P 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, Dubya and his cronies have done everything they can to split this country in many ways. You can see this right here every day on Yahoo! Answers, it is everywhere.
Liberal vs. Conservative
Legals vs. Illegals
Pro-Life vs. Pro-Choice
Rich vs. Poor
Corporate America vs. We The People
Pro-War vs. Peace
Dubya has done more to terrorize the public safety of the USA than any outsider.
Dubya writes an executive order to sidestep the Constitution at will. He was the one that said it's just a piece of paper.
Dubya spends our money recklessly. Right now over 9 trillion $$.
He is making more enemies throughout the world.
He has no idea what economics are.
His platform for his second election is a failure. No Child Left Behind.
Response to Katrina, was just one example that showed us all just how inept he is as a leader.
Impeachment is too good for him, IMHO
2006-09-05 00:47:18 · answer #4 · answered by Schona 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
no ineffective. the purpose is to grab oil as much as it can from Iraq. they knew very well before occupying Iraq about WMD is not there in Iraq. Once they Keep Iraq as Slave to UnipowerrSoul Authority of this Universe, they enter new venture of getting into Iran by telling the "Truth" about Nuclear War Head. The entire poor world watch it helplessly.
2006-09-05 00:31:04 · answer #5 · answered by adraya 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No, I think President Bush is doing a damn good job. Everyone always rips on the president no matter if they're doing good or bad, especially recently the media won't leave the presidents alone ever...
Most of the stuff people hear about him are just the media perverting the entire story to suite their agenda (currently anti-presidential...)
Media has extreme power in our country and they can, will and do use it to win people who don't look closely at the stories over to the media's agenda...
2006-09-05 00:24:04 · answer #6 · answered by Startoshadows 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
bush is using this frase of weapon of mass destruction to invade other countries with his smart bombs and take their oil. but he has been un successful
2006-09-05 00:55:09 · answer #7 · answered by khalidhamed 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
George Bush is fighting a war on terror; the democrats are fighting a war on George Bush.
2006-09-05 00:27:34 · answer #8 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
..bush is going to mess around and get us nuked is my opinion ... but im sure that the hundreds of thousands of dead arabs in the middle east could be labeled that ... and i kinda disagree on his effectiveness ... he and the administration are very effective in carrying out their goals ... they just arnt beneficial to the american people .. only to the elite that are making all the money and getting power from it.
2006-09-05 00:26:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
He's too stupid to be wepons of mass destruction
2006-09-05 00:22:50 · answer #10 · answered by brucy 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋