2006-09-04 15:15:10 · 8 answers · asked by Rathaford 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Is the grass really greener on the other side the fence? Is 2 always better than 1?
Only if your willing to give up what you have for something you expect to be better.
2006-09-04 15:23:46 · answer #1 · answered by iraq51 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I suppose if the bush shot poisonous thorns like darts at anything walking up to it (birds fly). The bush would have to be really big too, to hold all those birds. Billions of darts. No wonder the birds nest there.
2006-09-04 15:56:51 · answer #2 · answered by Dr. R 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Once the bird you have in hand dies, then you'd wish there were a billion in the bush to hear their singing..
:-)
2006-09-04 15:52:34 · answer #3 · answered by Andreba 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One bird in the hand is worth more. If Dubya Bush had a billion, he probably would misspend it.
2006-09-04 15:51:39 · answer #4 · answered by alnitaka 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you were starving to death, and the bird in your hand was a fried chicken?
If it was the golden bird of Ku Y'leh?
If the bird was really big and fast and you could fly one it, and the birds in the bush were angry and wanted to kill you?
2006-09-04 18:02:47 · answer #5 · answered by Michael M 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depends on..... Who or What...... the bird in the hand is
2006-09-04 15:23:54 · answer #6 · answered by pejon60 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If that were true I'd have more birds (funny haha)
2006-09-04 15:17:54 · answer #7 · answered by aotea s 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if you really want it to.
2006-09-04 15:19:35 · answer #8 · answered by Paley Pale 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋