I'm there. The woman wreaks intelligence so heavily she drowns everything in the room. I am in awe of her, and she is very likely the only person I will lift a finger to campaign for.
2006-09-04 13:18:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Speaking strictly of her personal credentials, the woman absolutely rocks. She's more intelligent, more educated, and more capable than anyone on this forum, and most people on the Hill. However, I would hope to see a candidate who was more of a less-government candidate. She's part of the whole monstrosity known as the Bush administration. In spite of being from the party of conservatism, the people in this administration have gone totally big government, and that scares me.
2006-09-04 20:23:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by jpj 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
This would be Bush part #3 . I bet George would become Secretary of State, Cheney Secretary of Interior, Rumsfeld would keep his job.
2006-09-05 14:54:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, she is the most qualified person in politics today. In both parties.
2006-09-04 22:23:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dionsays 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
I would vote for her. She is very intelligent and has a strong background in international affairs.
2006-09-04 20:17:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
You have to be kidding! No ,I would not vote for her, she reminds me of a puppet, not someone who can stand her ground. sorry. To Ceasar what is to Ceasar and to God what belongs to God!
2006-09-04 22:19:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I wouldn't vote for her
2006-09-04 20:21:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by ok 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
I wouldn't vote for her'''
2006-09-04 20:21:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by SUN FLOWER 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Hey, then Bush can give her BJ'S!
2006-09-04 20:25:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
no, she was a bad architect for Israel, Lebanon and,, she is not up to par for a candidate,, she was not elected,, she's a Bush appointee
2006-09-04 20:22:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋